Meghan Markle is NOT Black Ya’ll!!!

29 11 2017

I’m just sayin’, that’s all.


Meghan Markle’s Most Memorable Suits Moment Is Pretty Darn Raunchy

Mixed-race bedwench

Why Mulattoes and other Hybrids are not Afrikan

Buy the book, “ACBN: Afrikan Centered Biological Nationalism, A Primer


Uganda Begs for Indian Investment in Lucrative Mining and Tourism Sectors

22 11 2017

To continue with my observations in the last post entitled “Open reply to Pauline about the Blog Post ‘What is ACBN?‘…” This is another example of the kind of thinking which plagues Afrikans globally concerning the political and economic development models we are using. Here the Ugandan government has invited Indians whom Idi Amin rightly expelled to return and occupy an ownership and management class over the indigenous Afrikans themselves. My question is why does every nation all of a sudden in the last couple of hundred years need Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in order to “develop”? What source of funding did people use prior to the Bretton Woods international monetary system which instituted at the end of WWII and established the dollar as the world reserve currency? Through all of human history, were the fate of nations dependent on how well one could beg for FDI? This doesn’t make sense to me. In fact, it begs the question of who is directing countries like Uganda to seek investment from abroad, namely from countries like India. Could it be the people who originally brought the Indians there in the first place to serve as a merchant/buffer class to more efficiently exploit the Afrikans?

If it is unknown to the readers, the British government facilitated migration from India to Afrika to occupy these socio-economic positions. It was a tactical move to better protect the interests of the British colonial exploiters as they were attempting to build a global empire. This was the first iteration of a one world government. Thankfully, it failed, but true to form these criminal exploiters did not give up. Now “globalism” under the theology of “humanitarian intervention” and “multiculturalism” is the new system of global political-economic governance being constructed by these same European groups. Only this time in order to make the system more malleable, they are promoting the illusion of inclusion by giving small scale franchises in the form of neocolonial governments to Afrikan and other non-white leaders for the purposes of solidifying their hegemony this time.

If this model of FDI is the best and only viable model of development, then why are Afrikans in the diaspora excluded from participation in investment in Afrika? Presumably, the Ugandan and other governments know of the racist exploitation Afrikans in America face daily. Yet, Afrikan media outlets are curiously silent regarding this maltreatment and lack of economic opportunity. In fact, I see more discussion about the racism inflicted on Afrikans in America exposed on media outlets such as PressTV and Russia Today, but Afrikan media such as NTV Uganda & Kenya, Kenya Citizen TV, and Joy Online, have woefully small and inadequate coverage of these issues. Why? Is it racist to talk about the exploitation that one’s kinsman across the world are suffering at the hands of one’s “business partners” and new found BFFs? I guess it is in their minds, because of course, we all know the “white people have changed” from what they were during the enslavement and colonization period. (Yeah, right!)

This media bias can be seen in the seething joy and ecstatic celebration of outlets like the BBC at seeing the ouster of Robert Mugabe. They were literally salivating in the hopes of being able to broadcast that he had stepped down and the “will of the people” finally prevailed in Zimbabwe. Whatever mistakes and missteps he has made, he is the only Afrikan leader with international stature and who talks about the real problems Afrikans face in this system of globalization (which is actually white hegemony by another name). He actually discusses the problems of the lack of power the Afrikan nations possess and that the focus should be on internal development, and not with interfacing with foreign institutions and putting all of one’s energy into being the first to sell off all the resources to foreigners so that small factions of well-connected people can benefit financially by living as part of the “international community”. The unfortunate outcome of this might be a comprador class eager to partner with foreigners and benefit from the uneven trading system presently existing. These military takeovers may continue if Afrikan nations don’t undertake the structural re-architecture of their governing systems. This will help do at least two things. First, ensure the civil politicians are able to retire from office in dignity and still have a relevant role in society. Second, it will provide more resilience in the governing systems that focus on institutional continuity rather than personality cults. The model most Afrikan countries still have is based on the colonial governance model which was designed for a small clique of foreigners to have complete and unimpeachable power. If Afrikan nations are to develop real power based on our culture and identity, these types of structures will have to be jettisoned, modified, and/or updated.

One investment plan that Afrikan nations have yet to undertake is to identify Black (Afrikan) organizations in the USA and create a viable investment strategy for groups of Afrikan people in the USA who are the descendant of the victims of the Black Chattelization War.

(The Black Chattelization War is the more correct term for the “Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade” because it rightly identifies the fact that a war was fought and prisoners were taken who were subsequently enslaved intergenerationally and proper restitution has yet to be made for this crime.)

For example, an organization like the Nation of Islam or Afrikan Methodist Episcopal (A.M.E.) Church (both organizations that I do not advocate for, nor support, but they are examples of Black institutions in the USA with a sizable membership) could be identified by an Afrikan nation in need of FDI and given the opportunity for its membership to invest their capital in an equity fund which would give part ownership to each member of that organization in mines, construction projects, and other forms of infrastructure like airports, roads, railroads, water systems and the like. This would give Afrikans in the diaspora an economic and political stake regarding what happens in Afrika and would give Afrikan governments more leverage in negotiating trade agreements and determining international policies which they could bend to their favor. Programs for repatriation could be developed which privilege Afrikans in the diaspora with essential skills at getting residence visas, land grants or investment opportunities in real estate development projects for the purpose of inviting Afrikans abroad to live in Afrikan nations. Afrikans with skills in medicine, nursing, engineering, computer science, education, mathematics, science, technology, and even sociology or history can be welcomed just like the migrants are being welcomed with these skills in Europe, Canada and the USA to work in these sectors which allegedly have trouble finding qualified candidates. This would be one way of satisfying the need for FDI and correcting the historical crime of slavery as well as alleviating the victimization Afrikans face by the racist white dominant society in these expatriate colonial states such as the USA and Canada. A program like this would give the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) a much clearer mandate and educational policy which can offer real opportunity for Afrikans to help themselves instead of seeking employment with white owned and controlled multinational corporations or the US military. This would have a much better and long lasting effect rather than Afrikan nations sending their best and brightest students to the west and working for USA, British, and Canadian institutions as well.

Another interesting development is the touted impending introduction of the “petroyuan” as an addition to the international monetary system and a challenger to the sole dominance of the “petrodollar” foisted on the world by the USA in the early 1970s.

The most interesting aspect about this development for me is that the petroyuan is a “gold-backed” currency which will be able to settle transactions in the Chinese Renminbi (yuan) paper money which could in theory be traded for gold at anytime. This would provide a “safe-haven” for speculators, investors, and traders in the oil market. However, one must ask, “Where did China get the gold to initiate this trading market?” The answer of course is through mining concessions in various Afrikan Nations including Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda and others. So this too begs the question, why didn’t Afrikans simply set-up a gold-back currency to seize the oil trading market and in turn benefit by being able to use a sovereign currency to finance its own developmental goals? The answer is because China is being supported by a faction in the European hegemonic system to serve as a kind face on their continued plans for global domination in exchange for giving the Asians a seat at the global governance management table. Since the goal of Europeans is power at any cost, they have concluded that they will need the assistance of the East Eurasians (Chinese) to succeed in establishing a viable international economic order from which no nation or group can escape or successfully challenge. The Chinese are “all in” for this as it will save the communist party regime in Beijing and help to emigrate their surplus population to Afrikan nations to again serve as a merchant/management/buffer class over the Afrikans. Afrikan leaders have bought into this because they too will be saved and their relatively luxurious lifestyles will be ensured by the system. Mugabe in some ways challenged this, but with his isolation and the fervor of his political opponents to participate in this global system to satisfy their own selfish needs, it looks like Afrikans might be on the precipice of falling into a “honey trap” of apparent economic growth, but loss of real political power and independence as they must accept non-Afrikans in their midst to occupy high levels of society while the masses of Afrikans are still marginalized and used as poster children and props for “righteous humanitarian programs” and attempts by the global system through UN institutions to “alleviate poverty and disease, empower women, transition to a green economy”…Blah, Blah, Blah.

So, with the resignation of Mugabe and the calls and instituting a transitional authority in Zimbabwe to secure a safe transfer of power, we see one of the last of the revolutionary leaders of Afrika fading into the sunset. It is now time for this generation of Afrikans who are interested in continuing the process for attaining political-economic sovereignty and Afrikan power to do some real examination about our goals and methods for achieving them. We must ask are they truly our goals we are seeking or the goals of foreigners with a different agenda. Are the methods we are using actually successful? Are there other methods which might work better for us even though they are not sanctioned by “international institutions”? Are there specific problems that we have which only we can solve? We must be willing to identify them and dispel false narratives and failed policies in order not to be left behind or trampled underfoot by this white hegemonic, technocratic global onslaught yet again.

Open Reply to Pauline about the Blog Post “What is ACBN?”

20 11 2017

The following is a recent comment by a reader of The Lumumba Afrika Report by the name of Pauline. I am writing this open reply to the comment in order to illustrate several points that I think should be continually addressed with regard to Afrikan political thought at its present developmental stage.

Comment by Pauline (without corrections):

“Afrikan or African. I don’t really get it. As a Cameroonian, who loves her country and cultuee, but who has never set a foot in America, i don’t get ir. Never have a seen so much nonsense about race, of coursw racism is never ending like this. Sure own your culture, but come on people have always mixed and there are over 50 countries in Africa. The african who is born in africa, the half african born in africa by african parents, the black american who came to america 200 years ago. Who get a claim on who is to be what? Just rmbrace the beauty of the culture, don’t vack down and then who cares. You americans always talk about race nd for what?”

To rebut the comment point by point, I will start with the simple dichotomy with which the commenter begins the comment, namely implying the question of correctness in the use of African or Afrikan. The fact is that the spelling of Afrikan is the one which is used in one of the most prominent indigenous languages spoken on the Afrikan continent, that being Kiswahili. There are arguments as to whether the language is indeed indigenous, which are mainly focused on the large number of foreign “loan words” in the language. However, the English language, which spells Afrikan with a “c” instead of a “k”, has a similarly large amount of loan words in it as well. Yet, people don’t question the European origin of English nor the correctness of spelling differences in British and American English. To give an example, the word “beef” is actually from the French word “boeuf” which was spoken by the nobles of Britain when they were being dominated by France and had French regents in control of their monarchy. That word as well as pork (porc), fowl (volaille), difficult (difficile), and many others persist in the English language yet have foreign origins. In the modern sense, the Japanese word “tsunami” has replaced the English phrase “Tidal Wave” in recent years and no one seems to bat an eye. Yet, when an Afrikan person uses the Afrikan spelling of the word which describes our continent and the indigenous people who hail from that continent, we are met with scorn and derision as if we have done something incorrect. This indicates that for many Afrikans, their psychological orientation is primarily with identifying with foreign concepts, thoughts, systems, structures, and foreign people themselves. The general psychological disposition is not about studying our own concepts, philosophies, linguistics, biology, socio-economic and political systems in order to design and modernize systems which function with the purpose of maintaining our own survival as a biological group. It might seem that it is a small matter to make these conclusions based on positing a simple question “Afrikan or African”, but it nonetheless does indicate that there is a lower value placed on what is Afrikan by Afrikan people ourselves, and this is a MAJOR problem that we have yet to deal with comprehensively as a distinct people and socio-biological-political group.

The commenter actually concedes this point when she openly states that “I don’t get ir” (sic) She says that she has never seen so much “nonsense” about race. Well again, this supports my point in that Afrikans in the continent (and in the diaspora for that matter) have not taken on the task of studying the experience of Afrikan people globally, particularly regarding our interaction and victimization by non-Afrikan groups. Furthermore, the several scholarly articles and books that have been written by Afrikan people documenting the use of race as a weapon against the political organization and economic independence of Afrikans have not been infused in the curricula of so-called “independent” educational institutions across the continent. It should be common knowledge among Afrikans about the race-based policies that hampered the growth and development of the Afrikan world, its people, and how those policies morphed, but are still in effect today. These facts should especially be known among those who are from Afrikan areas which were adversely affected by The Black Chattelization War (aka “Slave Trade”) and European, Arab (and now Chinese) colonization like Cameroon, whose name itself means “shrimp” in the Portuguese language who were the people who named the area in the modern period.

She then claims that “racism is never ending like this”. I assume she is referring the ideas I wrote about in the article describing ACBN tenets. This statement of hers further indicates that the political orientations of Afrikan people are misguided because the basis of our outlook is significantly directed towards doing activity which “ends racism” and not orientated towards activity which gains power for Afrikan people collectively. Power wielded by Afrikan people through the organization of strong nations, with strong and functioning institutions, funded by strong economies, is the only way that Afrikan people can avoid being victimized by racism. It is the position of this writer that “racism” is a natural biological phenomenon on the earth and will always exist in some form or another, so ending racism is about as likely as ending the need of humans to procreate, eat, build shelters, and do the other myriad of things that help insure the biological survival of people in general. Power is also a natural phenomenon in nature and without which, one cannot survive. Moreover, groups cannot survive without power. It is power that initiates the activity which gives force and direction to human activity. However, power must be managed and it can only be done so effectively if the beneficiaries of power are properly identified. The popular ideal of “human survival” embodied in ideologies such as “humanism” and “humanitarianism” as a goal above and apart from the survival of a distinctive group of humans is nothing short of a plan of genocide, plain and simple. In order for general “human survival” to succeed, no concern must be given to the specific survival of distinctive biological groups (commonly referred to as a “race”) which were forged through a long history of genetic and environmental factors throughout time immemorial. This means that one or another group or groups must face functional extinction. Please see my article “Why Mulattoes and other Hybrids are not Afrikanhere.

In the above article I refer you to, you will see why the canard you repeated that “people have always mixed” is a destructive conclusion to hold. The effects of historical mixing have ALWAYS been disastrous for at least one group if not both groups who mixed. Copious examples of the outcome of this behavior are replete in history, but for Afrikan people, we should be advised that one common outcome of this idealistic “mixing” that you support, has been the rise of a group of whites who have monopolistic power over the masses of non-whites, with Afrikans typically occupying the bottom level of society. This should naturally compel Afrikans to reject mixing even more than all other races ( i.e. geno-cultural groups) on this planet. It is our collective mis-education in this area that makes us susceptible to foreign ideologies like the ones you adhere to. There is not one major social theory or ideology which exists presently whose foundational conceptual framework has at its basis the need for Afrikan survival. This also includes Christianity and Islam. A short study of the historical origins of these religions would reveal that they were both constructed with the intent to empower foreign groups to Afrika, not Afrikan people themselves. They were later imposed on Afrikan people through political-economic means and have continued to be practiced to this day by Afrikans even though it has not resulted in the similar level of status and economic power as it has for the groups which imposed them on us in the first place.

Lastly, you ask the question “who gets a claim on who is to be what?” In other words, you are asking, who is to decide who is an Afrikan? This is a very dangerous definition to outsource to an amorphous foreign authority which in your mind is still undefined. If Afrikan people don’t take it upon ourselves to define who is Afrikan, it will be defined by other groups with different and possibly opposing interests to our own. The question can only be answered historically and biologically. We have to look at history to discover how the existence of people whom you call “black americans” came into being. Where did they come from? Did they give up their nationality upon being kidnapped and sold into enslavement. No matter who did the kidnapping, selling, and buying, the fact remains that this was a criminal act and these people were wrongfully stripped of their national identity. For someone who claims to want all people to “end racism”, it is very curious that you do not support the right of return of these victims of enslavement. Yet, you support the imposed identity given to them by a foreign people who exploited these Afrikans for centuries without compensation. Again, our collective political orientation is misguided. This is again indicated by the statement you made of there being something called a “‘half african’ born in africa by african parents”. This is a logical impossibility. The word half means 50%. Therefore, by its very nature, it cannot be a whole. Meaning a mixed person (a person with each parent from two different races) is logically neither one nor the other race. Barack Obama is just as much White and he is Black, so it is racist (anti-Black) to refer to him as a Black president when he isn’t Black, he is mixed. The people in northern Afrika are Arabs and they migrated in and displaced the Afrikans living there. They are not Afrikan. Europeans similarly migrated to Afrika, so they are not Afrikan either. It is the bio-genetic heritage that Afrikan people share through the traits that we have, (e.g. brown to black skin and Afrikan textured hair) that makes us Afrikan. This is a biological designation that relates to the land of our origin. It does not refer to a place someone who does not have these traits was born or whose ancestors migrated to. Race is discussed in the USA because it is a tool for political control. If it wasn’t, why were people rejoicing over the “First ‘Black’ President”? Why did whites overwhelmingly elect Donald Trump? It is because race matters and is important in political and economic affairs! No matter how much you want to discount it or decide “not to understand”, race will always be used for social and political organization, so it is best to accept this reality before you wake up and realize that Afrikan people globally have no control over anything and we are totally dominated by trans-national corporations and inter-governmental institutions that are controlled by Europeans and a few Asians, and have Afrikan people reduced to slave status yet again. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks for reading.

ACBN: A Primer, Now Available!!

13 09 2017

ACBN: A Primer

The new book by Kwesi Anan Ababio is now available in paperback and eBook!

Go to for details on how to purchase your copy!

The book is also available on iBooks and at You can visit the Kwesi Ababio’s Author’s Spotlight page at for more details. Click the links below to learn more.


The Apple Who Fell From The Tree

22 08 2017

Most of these liberal whites that negros unquestioningly love and run after are only second, third, or fourth generation US citizens themselves. They basically just got off the boat a couple of generations ago and they have the nerve to try and tell Afrikan people what our political views should be when we have been in the USA suffering as an oppressed nation under white domination by terror longer than most of their peasant ancestors even knew that there was such a place called the United States! So, most of these yokels have unresolved issues about their own immigrant past that they are using Afrikan people to try and assuage.  Their goal is to make a society where all non-whites are subservient to their sick and twisted fantasies of themselves as liberators and saints.

The following video exposes one of these fake, Hollywood ‘left coast’ liberals in her repeated attempts to gain moral high ground in the eyes of the public by claiming that people who disagree with her are so-called Nazis. It turns out that behind the facade of the “changed white person” that so many brain-dead Afrikans lust after, is a sordid history no different than the overt, alt-right ‘racists’ that the liberal whites claim are the scourge of the earth and are supposedly vastly different from themselves. It seems that after all, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Another one of these poseurs is Ben Affleck whose family enslaved Afrikans, and so he directly benefited from our capture and exploitation. I am quite certain that if a thorough examination of family history were conducted, it would reveal that most of the ‘liberal’ whites who claim that “their family didn’t own any slaves” were somehow involved with enslavement, colonization, and/or white hegemony and were directly enriched from it. They now simply have the convenience of both plausible deniability, and a mass of willfully ignorant Afrikans who are enamored with having white friends and living in a post-racial society…even while we are at one of the most dangerous political moments in our history.

PS: Ignore the ads in the last minute of this video.

ACBN: A Primer, to be released in September 2017

5 08 2017

ACBN: A Primer, is the first book written and published by Kwesi Anan Ababio.

The book discusses essential concepts about Afrikan Centered Biological Nationalism and gives full credit to those who inspired and contributed to the ideas behind the creation of this book.

The book asks and attempts to answer questions like:
Who is an Afrikan?
What is ACBN?
Why Mulattoes and Other Hybrids Are Not Afrikan?…and much more

The 142 page book is an easy, engaging read and includes a contribution by special guest author Gaspar Yanga who writes a brilliant epilogue.

The book has nearly 30 color and black & white photographs, endnotes, a bibliography, and references detailing and supporting the thesis of the book.

Get your eBook or paperback copy as soon as it is available! It is essential reading for Afrikan people in the 21st century.

Links and instructions on how to make a purchase will be posted soon.

Email to reserve your copy before September 4, 2017 to receive an email notification upon release and a 10% discount.

Include in the subject line “ACBN BOOK“.

The Bastard Factor

24 04 2017

I overheard a conversation recently between a mulatto acquaintance of mine and another Black man which revealed something very interesting about the unintended results of interracial breeding and the impact it has on mulattoes.

The mulatto was asked if he was going home to visit his family for an upcoming vacation and disclosed that he was not. The reason he gave is that when he visits his home it is not the same anymore because most of his childhood friends are married now and staying in his parents’ home is not an option due to their lack of interest in him.

He was pressed on his meaning of this final point and he subsequently revealed that his parents were perfectly willing to meet him in a restaurant for a meal and hear about details of his life, but as far as staying with his parents for the duration of his vacation time home, he was certain that could not occur.

Again, he was questioned as to why this was and he disclosed that his biological parents are actually divorced now. This was a bit of information that I did not know, but had suspected since I know that these tragic arrangements (mixed race marriages) don’t usually work out. His mother is African and was born on the continent and his father is an IMA (inbred mutant albino) AKA white.

He said that some years ago his father had remarried a white hippie woman and that she was a university instructor and very “liberal”. She was into all this LGBTQ-LMNOP stuff and during an alleged nonchalant conversation about “homosexual rights”, she had baited him into a trap of admitting that he did not really care about the political result of such matters one way or the other. At the time, the mulatto was 20 years old and was just not interested in whether homosexuals had or did not have rights. This is quite a normal view of people his age. But this “liberal” immediately ran to the mulatto’s father in tears claiming that he had horrible discriminatory beliefs and she was afraid of him and so on. The mulatto’s father backed up his new white wife and literally told his son that “She is my wife now and you have to accept it and her beliefs”. The mulatto later rightly suspected that this hippie wanted to marginalize the white man’s children from the previous marriage and succeeded in setting him up in a fake row so that she could justify the father’s decision to limit contact with him, which he ultimately did.

In an ironic, but not too surprising twist, the African mother of this mulatto is living in an all-Black neighborhood in the USA which is wrought with all of the stereotypical ills we have come to associate with inner-city living—single mother culture, limited worldview, lowered expectations, lack of social courtesies, and reduced income potentials. This it turns out is the reason this mulatto is living far from home and continues to seek out opportunities that restrict his ability to return there.

After hearing the story, I found it astonishing yet typical, and not all too surprising, that this is the result of these interactions. The faux liberal white male (or female) is commonly looking to fulfill a fantasy or desire for the world to reflect their half-baked ideology, and so he mates with an Afrikan woman in order to satisfy some sick personal need or to solve a perceived social problem which only he can do because of his “white male capability and compassion”. However, the social problem which is attempted to be solved through this behavior is never resolved and is only exacerbated. The outcome is that the white participant gets tired of their negro pet and the race-based incompatibility of the relationship rises to the forefront. I suspect that as time goes on, often the white partner (especially the male), realizes that the social capital they lose by marrying an ordinary negro and having mulatto children is not sufficiently balanced by their satisfaction in strictly adhering to their ideological tenants. So, in this case the IMA male divorced the negro and found an IMA (white) wife in order to regain some of his lost manhood and respect in the eyes of his white compatriots. This is why he mentioned to the mulatto son “this is my new wife now” in an effort to establish his new social reality in the mind of his mulatto son and limit his access to him in certain social situations. Moreover, because his son does not look like him, he had to, in a very passive-aggressive way, impress upon his mind that any experiences he will have because he is not a white person should not be brought to the doorstep of him and his new white wife. This resulted in the mulatto creating a life for himself elsewhere and pursuing not only non-Black females, but non-white female romantic partners as well. The likely product of his life, should he choose to procreate, will be another mixed-race person. The child will be either mixed with Asian, Arab, or some other female from a mixed-race group like mestizos.

The African mother who fought so hard to disavow her Afrikanity and possibly dreamed of a lavish lifestyle in the arms of her “rich” white man from the west, ended up terminating herself genetically and living among the very Africans that she was trying so hard to escape.

These liberal whites mate with Afrikans and other non-whites usually due to a sense of powerlessness in their own socio-political structure and want to feel some power, any power, by offering the fantasy of social uplift into unattainable whiteness to some random non-white sycophant. Reality creeps in eventually, and the white person, reticent to give up their “liberal” delusions, then makes the unconscious decision to reject the pet and her children and marry a white hippie who would protect his cover of being “non-racist” and interested in social justice, while he can safely and without negative repercussions, reject his bastard offspring from his ill-fated, sexual, social experiment. Luckily for them, the white legal system has defined his children as “Black”, so he is comfortably assured that he has no further responsibility for the outcome of their lives.

My conclusion and moral from this story…DON’T RACE MIX! It doesn’t solve the problems you intend it to solve and it invariably just causes more! There is no ultimate benefit to anything in this behavior except your loins (and by extension your ego) in such unions. The misplaced value that Afrikans place on pale-skin is a death warrant to your race and your own personal genetics. The mulatto children will quietly resent the position you put them in of being stuck between two worlds. That is, being rejected by a racist anti-Black parent and embarrassed about their self-loathing negro parent who hated themselves so much that they were compelled to produce a genetic mutant.



Matters of Purification for Afurakanu/Afuraitkaitnut (Africans~Black People)


Afrikan by ancestry, Afrikan in spirit, Afrikan forever

Afrikan Sovereignty Magazine

Examining the World From an Afrikan Nationalist Point of View

Gullah/Geechee Nation

WEBE Gullah/Geechee Anointed Peepol!

Black Homeschool Mom

A resource site for diverse home educators.

Umkhonto we Sizwe! (Spear of the Nation)

Independent Afrikan centered parenting and education

Word N Sound Live Literature Movement #WordNSound we trust...

Open Revolt!

Building the New Resistance

Black Women of Brazil

The site dedicated to Brazilian women of African descent

Too Much Black

We Done Begun

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury

The Only Way Is Ghana

Moving from UK to Ghana isn't easy Kraa

Ancient Kushites

Sanctuary for Black Gods

%d bloggers like this: