I Hate to Say I Told You So, But…

9 12 2017

Well, that didn’t take too long. Zimbabwe Economic Development Minister Patrick Chinamasa presented his 2018 National Budget amid much fanfare and adulation by foreign press outlets.

It seems that what I feared in the article “Uganda Begs for Indian Investment in Lucrative Mining and Tourism Sectors” is coming into view. I will highlight a few details from the article published by the Herald of Zimbabwe, then contrast that with an article from Bloomberg News (a journal dedicated to informing the Eurasian investment class about investment conditions and opportunities), and the above video from CGTN. The latter is the Chinese international news outlet which has a bureau in nearly every country on the Afrikan continent informing Chinese investors of economic and social conditions in the countries they have targeted for colonization. Please note that to date, there is not one major news media outlet that covers general news concerning the Afrikan continent except for CGTN, and a few individual shows on western media channels like CNN, BBC, and France 24. To my knowledge, an all Afrikan, international news network owned by Afrikans and designed to inform Afrikan people has not yet been realized. I kindly ask the readers to please correct me if I am incorrect on this point.

In the Herald article and the CGTN news video, the writer quotes extensively from Chinamasa who uses a lot of academic vernacular to communicate the intentions and policies of the budget. It is my view that he does so for two reasons. One to confound lay persons who might take an interest in what he is saying, and two, to directly communicate to foreign investors in the lingo that they understand—-because they created it! Chinamasa starts by claiming that the new government intends to focus on bringing back funds which were absconded by business officials to foreign bank accounts and money which was “externalized” through illicit monetary transactions. This is all being done to “benefit the general public” who pay higher fees and costs due to such activity. The list of foci in the budget are printed below. Notice the final highlight in the budget!

Highlights

  • Workers above 65 years of age to be retired.
  • Recruitment frozen.
  • Voluntary retirement scheme offered.
  • Cuts in staff benefits loom.
  • Redundant officers to be retired.
  • Rationalisation of youth officers. 
  • 528 unqualified Public Service members to go.
  • First class air travel for most Govt officers banned.
  • Vehicle scheme for senior Govt officials reviewed.
  • Indigenisation law revised.  ⇐**

In addition, there are plans afoot to re-introduce a Zimbabwean currency. Even though Mugabe had these plans as well, they were foiled due to economic sanctions which devalued the Zimbabwe dollar to the point of worthlessness. This quote from the newspaper “New Zimbabwe” via allafrica.com is very informative.

“One thing for certain which touched President’s (Mnangagwa) heart was the issue of re- introducing our own currency; that matter has generated a lot of interest amongst investors from South Africa, China even in the European Union who want to see this country progressing.

“President Mnangagwa is being accepted across the world with various countries pledging to work and assist the country to retain to its former glory.

BINGO! If there is any other clear indication that what happened in November was a coup to oust Mugabe and bring in leadership who would not only be friendly to non-Afrikan domination of the Zimbabwe economy, but privilege their command and control of the economy, it is in the above quotation.

With that said, Economic Minister Chinamasa further stated that he wants to speed up digitalization of financial services to make it “difficult for people to engage in dishonest and corrupt practices” Yeah, OK, I believe that because the 2008 financial meltdown in the USA, which was brought about by dishonest and corrupt practices, was really initiated by the fact that full digitalization of the US economy had not yet occurred. SMH. If anything, digitization makes it more efficient for foreigners to steal from the Zimbabwe economy because at present they have the software, technology, and infrastructure to facilitate and implement digitization. Moreover, the nominally “independent” SWIFT code system which is tacitly controlled through international institutions of the USA and EU is the mechanism by which sanctions are placed on countries which prevents them from trading in international currency, namely the US dollar which is needed to purchase goods on the international market most notably oil. The Chinese have been constructing their own “alternative” system for years now. It is called the CIPS “Chinese International Payment System” and they have been in negotiations with the Russians to implement it which was supposed to happen in 2015, but has not yet been widely adopted. However, with this new announcement by Zimbabwe, this could be just the opportunity the Chinese need to test their system on the Afrikan continent.

Another telling revelation in the article states that across all government agencies, the quality of services needs to be more facilitative and devoid of corrupt practices. This is because…

Zimbabwe competes with its regional neighbours for investment, business and tourism…

That is to say, Afrikans are in competition with other Afrikans for the attention of Eurasians, rather than in cooperation with each other to interconnect their economies and build strong industries which would primarily serve Afrikan businesses, consumers, and industrial projects. Let it not be said that European industries don’t compete also. For example, the European aeronautical company Airbus is in competition with the USA based Boeing company to sell aircraft and weapons systems to developing nations. However, the profits are recycled into the western economies to fund organizations like NATO and the UN to help white hegemony police the world and ensure that countries like Zimbabwe remain stagnant.

The new budget also proposes centralization of revenue instead of each ministry collecting revenue to fund its own budgets. This could be a good thing if the purpose is to create a strong and well-funded system to finance the project for Zimbabwean power, and hence Afrikan power. But it is not a welcome development if centralization is seen as a means to more comfortably interface with Eurasian institutions to more effectively control (and arrest) the development of a strong sub-continental Afrikan power state. Dr. Amos Wilson said in his lecture “The Falsification of Afrikan Consciousness” that:

“…it is not the mode of thinking (or organization) that is the problem, it is for what you use the thinking that presents the problem. If you use the thinking (or organization) for the destruction of Afrikan people, or use it such that it does not empower Afrikan people, then you are misusing it.”

According to the article in the Herald, A National Prosecuting Authority will also be established to “fight corruption”. This agency will be

“…required to publish reports once every quarter giving statistics on the: number of arrests made; number of successful prosecutions or convictions; and value of money or property recovered, as a result of their interventions”.

My question is, does this extend to non-Afrikans too? Will Chinese, European, Indian, Lebanese, and Arab businessmen and women be arrested when charged with corruption and convicted to long prison sentences and/or deported never to return if found guilty of these crimes and transgressions? It is one thing to punish relatively powerless Afrikan people for breaking the law, but it is a total other thing to let it be known that non-Afrikans will be herded into incarceration facilities and severely punished for their crimes too. In order to do this, crimes which harm the building of an Afrikan power state will have to be defined and codified, and then if people are found to be in violation, they must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Just putting small-scale civil servants in jail for demanding payoffs for carrying out their official duties is not enough. What about the crimes of expropriating resources, lack of skills transfer, and lack of appointing capable Afrikan men and woman to be the managing directors, chairpersons, and leaders of major industries, businesses, and other institutions in Zimbabwe? I have personally seen mediocre white people occupying leadership positions in many institutions located in Afrikan nations simply because they are white. These people have no superior skills and have not demonstrated any major improvements to the socio-economic life of Afrikans.  Most of them are there because they could not get a job in the west, so they are cast off to Afrika to serve as the “friendly white face” over which the locals drool in hopes of having the inbred mutant albino (IMA) facilitate their journey to the west or go into a ramshackle business with them as the sponsor and major partner. I have seen this first hand! Whites with cars, nice houses, and well-paying jobs, but are total losers and living the good life in Afrika, while Afrikan youth, with a similar education and skill set, can barely find a job.

This contradiction in focus on who is living a lifestyle beyond their means is elucidated in the last point from the 2018 budget mentioned in the Herald article. Specifically, the new policy of “life style audits of all public office holders to ensure that they are commensurate with their level of income”. How about the same type of audits for these foreign NGO employees in addition to skills audits to ensure they are not just lowly expatriates living a lavish life under the guise of “helping Afrikans develop”. If Afrikan officials must be scrutinized for their daily expenses, how about the same for these foreigners living on the teat of the western, neo-hippie, tree-hugging policy of “helping the third world”. The so-called “third world” has been developing for 60+ years now. Isn’t it time to declare that these “good white people” have failed?

 

Now, let’s look at the Bloomberg article, entitled “Zimbabwe to Cut Spending, Relax Its Black Ownership Laws”.

The top two bullet points in the article were:

  • Majority black-ownership law confined to platinum, diamonds
  • Country seeks to boost tax revenue to narrow budget deficit

The first statement just beneath those bullet points was:

Zimbabwe will trim spending and increase tax revenue next year and relax laws that require black citizens hold majority stakes in companies as it looks to restore confidence and boost economic growth, Finance Minister Patrick Chinamasa said.

My questions are, to restore whose confidence? Boost what kind of economic growth? Since this is a European Jew owned periodical, we know that the confidence to be restored will be Europeans and Eurasians in general. The economic growth will likely be for multinational corporations and investors with brokerage accounts in the major investment banks of the east and west such Goldman Sachs, Barclay’s, and HSBC.

The Bloomberg article further states that,

The unsatisfactory performance of the economy is being underpinned by declining domestic and foreign investor confidence levels, against the background of policy inconsistencies in an uncertain and uncompetitive business environment,” Chinamasa said.

Who are these domestic and foreign investors specifically? Has there been a survey conducted and published to measure the confidence levels of these groups? Since we know that Mnangagwa has promised to compensate the criminal European farmers from the land that they stole, are these the “domestic investors” of which his Economic Development Minister Chinamasa spoke?

Here in the next passage are blatant lies and misrepresentations printed shamelessly by Bloomberg News:

Former leader Robert Mugabe resigned two weeks ago after an army-led coup ended his 37-year rule in which agricultural output collapsed due to forced repossessions of commercially productive farmland. Zimbabwe abandoned its currency in 2009 due to hyperinflation and the economy has halved in size since 2000.”

So, readers are to believe that simply because land was correctly repossessed by Zimbabweans, the commercial productivity collapsed? That is to say that Afrikan people cannot learn how to farm in the way that the European thieves can. Or more correctly, Afrikan farmers under Mugabe’s rule didn’t simply produce cash crops for export into the European markets. Hence, they collapsed. Also, it was the fault of that notorious international villain who goes by the name of Hyperinflation that “halved the size” of the economy, not the crippling sanctions imposed by the USA and EU which isolated Zimbabwe from participating in markets and banking systems of the west.

It is now readily apparent that the present Zimbabwe administration longs for the days of European expatriate colonialism, and their only problem with Rhodesia was that Ian Smith wanted to operate the government by and for Europeans only and wanted to exclude the Afrikans. This historic error by Smith has now been corrected. So now, the Eurasians can return to devilishly exploiting the land and resources just as long as they give a few well-placed Afrikans a cut of the profits.

The last paragraph is very enlightening as it gives investment advice to readers who do their due diligence to research the companies mentioned.

Zimbabwe holds the world’s biggest platinum reserves after South Africa and also has chrome, gold, iron ore, coal and diamonds. While mining is the largest source of foreign currency, fresh capital dried up under the law forcing foreign, white-owned companies to cede 51 percent of their businesses to black Zimbabweans or the government. (Editorial note: Zimbabweans are Black so my strikethrough was to correct a redundancy) Anglo American Platinum Ltd., Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd., and Sinosteel Corp. are among companies operating there.

You no doubt have noticed that the companies recommended for investment are all Eurasian companies who sell/provide platinum to major defense, automotive, technological, manufacturing and aerospace industries. This will now be done without Afrikan ownership and Afrikan-centered directed policies for local investment to build local industrial capacity and independent manufacturing businesses.

So, we see in clear language the definitive and undeniable focus of the Afrikan political class. In my last post, “Green Shoots in the Black World?” I discussed the necessary caution people should have at hearing Afrikan political leaders engage in “bad Black talk”. It usually is a cover for gaining favor and closer proximity to foreigners. However, one thing is known from hearing leaders engage in such rhetoric, we now have definitive proof that they are aware of the structural and developmental problems that Afrikan nations have and of their solutions. It just so happens that most of them don’t want to pursue the solutions. The main reason for this is to protect their status as international second bananas, third tier technocrats, and fourth rate hucksters. I wish it were different, but for now, this is the situation we are in.

Advertisements




Meghan Markle is NOT Black Ya’ll!!!

29 11 2017

I’m just sayin’, that’s all.

 

Meghan Markle’s Most Memorable Suits Moment Is Pretty Darn Raunchy

Mixed-race bedwench

Why Mulattoes and other Hybrids are not Afrikan

Buy the book, “ACBN: Afrikan Centered Biological Nationalism, A Primer

www.sonofahset.wordpress.com





Open Reply to Pauline about the Blog Post “What is ACBN?”

20 11 2017

The following is a recent comment by a reader of The Lumumba Afrika Report by the name of Pauline. I am writing this open reply to the comment in order to illustrate several points that I think should be continually addressed with regard to Afrikan political thought at its present developmental stage.

Comment by Pauline (without corrections):

“Afrikan or African. I don’t really get it. As a Cameroonian, who loves her country and cultuee, but who has never set a foot in America, i don’t get ir. Never have a seen so much nonsense about race, of coursw racism is never ending like this. Sure own your culture, but come on people have always mixed and there are over 50 countries in Africa. The african who is born in africa, the half african born in africa by african parents, the black american who came to america 200 years ago. Who get a claim on who is to be what? Just rmbrace the beauty of the culture, don’t vack down and then who cares. You americans always talk about race nd for what?”

To rebut the comment point by point, I will start with the simple dichotomy with which the commenter begins the comment, namely implying the question of correctness in the use of African or Afrikan. The fact is that the spelling of Afrikan is the one which is used in one of the most prominent indigenous languages spoken on the Afrikan continent, that being Kiswahili. There are arguments as to whether the language is indeed indigenous, which are mainly focused on the large number of foreign “loan words” in the language. However, the English language, which spells Afrikan with a “c” instead of a “k”, has a similarly large amount of loan words in it as well. Yet, people don’t question the European origin of English nor the correctness of spelling differences in British and American English. To give an example, the word “beef” is actually from the French word “boeuf” which was spoken by the nobles of Britain when they were being dominated by France and had French regents in control of their monarchy. That word as well as pork (porc), fowl (volaille), difficult (difficile), and many others persist in the English language yet have foreign origins. In the modern sense, the Japanese word “tsunami” has replaced the English phrase “Tidal Wave” in recent years and no one seems to bat an eye. Yet, when an Afrikan person uses the Afrikan spelling of the word which describes our continent and the indigenous people who hail from that continent, we are met with scorn and derision as if we have done something incorrect. This indicates that for many Afrikans, their psychological orientation is primarily with identifying with foreign concepts, thoughts, systems, structures, and foreign people themselves. The general psychological disposition is not about studying our own concepts, philosophies, linguistics, biology, socio-economic and political systems in order to design and modernize systems which function with the purpose of maintaining our own survival as a biological group. It might seem that it is a small matter to make these conclusions based on positing a simple question “Afrikan or African”, but it nonetheless does indicate that there is a lower value placed on what is Afrikan by Afrikan people ourselves, and this is a MAJOR problem that we have yet to deal with comprehensively as a distinct people and socio-biological-political group.

The commenter actually concedes this point when she openly states that “I don’t get ir” (sic) She says that she has never seen so much “nonsense” about race. Well again, this supports my point in that Afrikans in the continent (and in the diaspora for that matter) have not taken on the task of studying the experience of Afrikan people globally, particularly regarding our interaction and victimization by non-Afrikan groups. Furthermore, the several scholarly articles and books that have been written by Afrikan people documenting the use of race as a weapon against the political organization and economic independence of Afrikans have not been infused in the curricula of so-called “independent” educational institutions across the continent. It should be common knowledge among Afrikans about the race-based policies that hampered the growth and development of the Afrikan world, its people, and how those policies morphed, but are still in effect today. These facts should especially be known among those who are from Afrikan areas which were adversely affected by The Black Chattelization War (aka “Slave Trade”) and European, Arab (and now Chinese) colonization like Cameroon, whose name itself means “shrimp” in the Portuguese language who were the people who named the area in the modern period.

She then claims that “racism is never ending like this”. I assume she is referring the ideas I wrote about in the article describing ACBN tenets. This statement of hers further indicates that the political orientations of Afrikan people are misguided because the basis of our outlook is significantly directed towards doing activity which “ends racism” and not orientated towards activity which gains power for Afrikan people collectively. Power wielded by Afrikan people through the organization of strong nations, with strong and functioning institutions, funded by strong economies, is the only way that Afrikan people can avoid being victimized by racism. It is the position of this writer that “racism” is a natural biological phenomenon on the earth and will always exist in some form or another, so ending racism is about as likely as ending the need of humans to procreate, eat, build shelters, and do the other myriad of things that help insure the biological survival of people in general. Power is also a natural phenomenon in nature and without which, one cannot survive. Moreover, groups cannot survive without power. It is power that initiates the activity which gives force and direction to human activity. However, power must be managed and it can only be done so effectively if the beneficiaries of power are properly identified. The popular ideal of “human survival” embodied in ideologies such as “humanism” and “humanitarianism” as a goal above and apart from the survival of a distinctive group of humans is nothing short of a plan of genocide, plain and simple. In order for general “human survival” to succeed, no concern must be given to the specific survival of distinctive biological groups (commonly referred to as a “race”) which were forged through a long history of genetic and environmental factors throughout time immemorial. This means that one or another group or groups must face functional extinction. Please see my article “Why Mulattoes and other Hybrids are not Afrikanhere.

In the above article I refer you to, you will see why the canard you repeated that “people have always mixed” is a destructive conclusion to hold. The effects of historical mixing have ALWAYS been disastrous for at least one group if not both groups who mixed. Copious examples of the outcome of this behavior are replete in history, but for Afrikan people, we should be advised that one common outcome of this idealistic “mixing” that you support, has been the rise of a group of whites who have monopolistic power over the masses of non-whites, with Afrikans typically occupying the bottom level of society. This should naturally compel Afrikans to reject mixing even more than all other races ( i.e. geno-cultural groups) on this planet. It is our collective mis-education in this area that makes us susceptible to foreign ideologies like the ones you adhere to. There is not one major social theory or ideology which exists presently whose foundational conceptual framework has at its basis the need for Afrikan survival. This also includes Christianity and Islam. A short study of the historical origins of these religions would reveal that they were both constructed with the intent to empower foreign groups to Afrika, not Afrikan people themselves. They were later imposed on Afrikan people through political-economic means and have continued to be practiced to this day by Afrikans even though it has not resulted in the similar level of status and economic power as it has for the groups which imposed them on us in the first place.

Lastly, you ask the question “who gets a claim on who is to be what?” In other words, you are asking, who is to decide who is an Afrikan? This is a very dangerous definition to outsource to an amorphous foreign authority which in your mind is still undefined. If Afrikan people don’t take it upon ourselves to define who is Afrikan, it will be defined by other groups with different and possibly opposing interests to our own. The question can only be answered historically and biologically. We have to look at history to discover how the existence of people whom you call “black americans” came into being. Where did they come from? Did they give up their nationality upon being kidnapped and sold into enslavement. No matter who did the kidnapping, selling, and buying, the fact remains that this was a criminal act and these people were wrongfully stripped of their national identity. For someone who claims to want all people to “end racism”, it is very curious that you do not support the right of return of these victims of enslavement. Yet, you support the imposed identity given to them by a foreign people who exploited these Afrikans for centuries without compensation. Again, our collective political orientation is misguided. This is again indicated by the statement you made of there being something called a “‘half african’ born in africa by african parents”. This is a logical impossibility. The word half means 50%. Therefore, by its very nature, it cannot be a whole. Meaning a mixed person (a person with each parent from two different races) is logically neither one nor the other race. Barack Obama is just as much White and he is Black, so it is racist (anti-Black) to refer to him as a Black president when he isn’t Black, he is mixed. The people in northern Afrika are Arabs and they migrated in and displaced the Afrikans living there. They are not Afrikan. Europeans similarly migrated to Afrika, so they are not Afrikan either. It is the bio-genetic heritage that Afrikan people share through the traits that we have, (e.g. brown to black skin and Afrikan textured hair) that makes us Afrikan. This is a biological designation that relates to the land of our origin. It does not refer to a place someone who does not have these traits was born or whose ancestors migrated to. Race is discussed in the USA because it is a tool for political control. If it wasn’t, why were people rejoicing over the “First ‘Black’ President”? Why did whites overwhelmingly elect Donald Trump? It is because race matters and is important in political and economic affairs! No matter how much you want to discount it or decide “not to understand”, race will always be used for social and political organization, so it is best to accept this reality before you wake up and realize that Afrikan people globally have no control over anything and we are totally dominated by trans-national corporations and inter-governmental institutions that are controlled by Europeans and a few Asians, and have Afrikan people reduced to slave status yet again. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks for reading.





The Counter Racist Cul-de-sac

18 04 2017

This video points out the ridiculousness of being a “counter-racist codist”. The problem is not so much that these “victims” have a “code”, it is that they have misidentified the solution. Sure, “the problem is white people“, but we must use specific tools and strategies to defeat that problem. And it is not limited to just being cute and clever with the use of words. One needs organized group power to handle these IMAs and that is being demonstrated by nations like North Korea, China, Iran, and others. The following comment written by a previous viewer of the video says is plainly.

“So Fucking What! The white lady was right. This IS why they elected Trump and the (Asian) woman is not an American. She admitted it herself! Am I supposed the feel sorry for yet another white identified Asian woman trying her best to be an honorary white? Boo Fucking Hoo! Asia is rising in global economic significance now. If I were an Asian I’d be on the first thing smoking to an economically secure Asian country which has plenty of nukes, no terrorism, and no mass immigration problem. WTF? She seems like a spoiled brat to me. No sympathy. (BTW, stop trying to play on our emotions by playing that Donny Hathaway song. That was a pretty cheap attempt at emotional blackmail) THERE IS NO GLOBAL SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY! There are only a bunch of negros who refuse to organize themselves and their resources in order to build power. “White Supremacy” didn’t stop Kim Jon Un from building nuclear weapons. And he’s not backing down to this fantasy system either. Especially with another nuclear armed Asian power backing him up with a seat on the UNSC. Get a clue!”

I concur.





Typical White Liberal Hypocrites

31 01 2017





Muhammad Ali’s Grandson

9 06 2016

Here is the result of that misguided belief in the “one-drop rule” and “Blacks come in all colors” garbage. With the sexual behavior of some Africans, they are trying their best to make these canards into a reality. It won’t work though. The only thing that will happen is the breeding out of the silly Africans, and the development of mixed-race white people who will infiltrate our group because Muhammad Ali was their great, great grandfather. Dumb…SMDH!

Amos Magazine

alisgrandson.jpg

Black Power rhetoric will never impress me.

View original post





Shout out to Moni Tano!

26 05 2016

Great research by our sister Moni Tano. This video is one of the main reasons why Afrikans need an ACBN psychology and our own nation-state. (Warning: Mulatto alert at 3:51)








AfriKaNeedsToOwnItsResources

Afrikan by ancestry, Afrikan in spirit, Afrikan forever

Afrikan Sovereignty Magazine

Examining the World From an Afrikan Nationalist Point of View

Gullah/Geechee Nation

WEBE Gullah/Geechee Anointed Peepol!

Black Homeschool Mom

A resource site for diverse home educators.

Umkhonto we Sizwe! (Spear of the Nation)

Independent Afrikan centered parenting and education

Word N Sound Live Literature Co.

...in #WordNSound we trust...

Open Revolt!

Building the New Resistance

Black Women of Brazil

The site dedicated to Brazilian women of African descent

Too Much Black

We Done Begun

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury

The Only Way Is Ghana

Moving from UK to Ghana isn't easy Kraa

KINGDOM OF KUSH

Melaninated Kings and Queens

Saynsumthn's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

%d bloggers like this: