Open Reply to Pauline about the Blog Post “What is ACBN?”

20 11 2017

The following is a recent comment by a reader of The Lumumba Afrika Report by the name of Pauline. I am writing this open reply to the comment in order to illustrate several points that I think should be continually addressed with regard to Afrikan political thought at its present developmental stage.

Comment by Pauline (without corrections):

“Afrikan or African. I don’t really get it. As a Cameroonian, who loves her country and cultuee, but who has never set a foot in America, i don’t get ir. Never have a seen so much nonsense about race, of coursw racism is never ending like this. Sure own your culture, but come on people have always mixed and there are over 50 countries in Africa. The african who is born in africa, the half african born in africa by african parents, the black american who came to america 200 years ago. Who get a claim on who is to be what? Just rmbrace the beauty of the culture, don’t vack down and then who cares. You americans always talk about race nd for what?”

To rebut the comment point by point, I will start with the simple dichotomy with which the commenter begins the comment, namely implying the question of correctness in the use of African or Afrikan. The fact is that the spelling of Afrikan is the one which is used in one of the most prominent indigenous languages spoken on the Afrikan continent, that being Kiswahili. There are arguments as to whether the language is indeed indigenous, which are mainly focused on the large number of foreign “loan words” in the language. However, the English language, which spells Afrikan with a “c” instead of a “k”, has a similarly large amount of loan words in it as well. Yet, people don’t question the European origin of English nor the correctness of spelling differences in British and American English. To give an example, the word “beef” is actually from the French word “boeuf” which was spoken by the nobles of Britain when they were being dominated by France and had French regents in control of their monarchy. That word as well as pork (porc), fowl (volaille), difficult (difficile), and many others persist in the English language yet have foreign origins. In the modern sense, the Japanese word “tsunami” has replaced the English phrase “Tidal Wave” in recent years and no one seems to bat an eye. Yet, when an Afrikan person uses the Afrikan spelling of the word which describes our continent and the indigenous people who hail from that continent, we are met with scorn and derision as if we have done something incorrect. This indicates that for many Afrikans, their psychological orientation is primarily with identifying with foreign concepts, thoughts, systems, structures, and foreign people themselves. The general psychological disposition is not about studying our own concepts, philosophies, linguistics, biology, socio-economic and political systems in order to design and modernize systems which function with the purpose of maintaining our own survival as a biological group. It might seem that it is a small matter to make these conclusions based on positing a simple question “Afrikan or African”, but it nonetheless does indicate that there is a lower value placed on what is Afrikan by Afrikan people ourselves, and this is a MAJOR problem that we have yet to deal with comprehensively as a distinct people and socio-biological-political group.

The commenter actually concedes this point when she openly states that “I don’t get ir” (sic) She says that she has never seen so much “nonsense” about race. Well again, this supports my point in that Afrikans in the continent (and in the diaspora for that matter) have not taken on the task of studying the experience of Afrikan people globally, particularly regarding our interaction and victimization by non-Afrikan groups. Furthermore, the several scholarly articles and books that have been written by Afrikan people documenting the use of race as a weapon against the political organization and economic independence of Afrikans have not been infused in the curricula of so-called “independent” educational institutions across the continent. It should be common knowledge among Afrikans about the race-based policies that hampered the growth and development of the Afrikan world, its people, and how those policies morphed, but are still in effect today. These facts should especially be known among those who are from Afrikan areas which were adversely affected by The Black Chattelization War (aka “Slave Trade”) and European, Arab (and now Chinese) colonization like Cameroon, whose name itself means “shrimp” in the Portuguese language who were the people who named the area in the modern period.

She then claims that “racism is never ending like this”. I assume she is referring the ideas I wrote about in the article describing ACBN tenets. This statement of hers further indicates that the political orientations of Afrikan people are misguided because the basis of our outlook is significantly directed towards doing activity which “ends racism” and not orientated towards activity which gains power for Afrikan people collectively. Power wielded by Afrikan people through the organization of strong nations, with strong and functioning institutions, funded by strong economies, is the only way that Afrikan people can avoid being victimized by racism. It is the position of this writer that “racism” is a natural biological phenomenon on the earth and will always exist in some form or another, so ending racism is about as likely as ending the need of humans to procreate, eat, build shelters, and do the other myriad of things that help insure the biological survival of people in general. Power is also a natural phenomenon in nature and without which, one cannot survive. Moreover, groups cannot survive without power. It is power that initiates the activity which gives force and direction to human activity. However, power must be managed and it can only be done so effectively if the beneficiaries of power are properly identified. The popular ideal of “human survival” embodied in ideologies such as “humanism” and “humanitarianism” as a goal above and apart from the survival of a distinctive group of humans is nothing short of a plan of genocide, plain and simple. In order for general “human survival” to succeed, no concern must be given to the specific survival of distinctive biological groups (commonly referred to as a “race”) which were forged through a long history of genetic and environmental factors throughout time immemorial. This means that one or another group or groups must face functional extinction. Please see my article “Why Mulattoes and other Hybrids are not Afrikanhere.

In the above article I refer you to, you will see why the canard you repeated that “people have always mixed” is a destructive conclusion to hold. The effects of historical mixing have ALWAYS been disastrous for at least one group if not both groups who mixed. Copious examples of the outcome of this behavior are replete in history, but for Afrikan people, we should be advised that one common outcome of this idealistic “mixing” that you support, has been the rise of a group of whites who have monopolistic power over the masses of non-whites, with Afrikans typically occupying the bottom level of society. This should naturally compel Afrikans to reject mixing even more than all other races ( i.e. geno-cultural groups) on this planet. It is our collective mis-education in this area that makes us susceptible to foreign ideologies like the ones you adhere to. There is not one major social theory or ideology which exists presently whose foundational conceptual framework has at its basis the need for Afrikan survival. This also includes Christianity and Islam. A short study of the historical origins of these religions would reveal that they were both constructed with the intent to empower foreign groups to Afrika, not Afrikan people themselves. They were later imposed on Afrikan people through political-economic means and have continued to be practiced to this day by Afrikans even though it has not resulted in the similar level of status and economic power as it has for the groups which imposed them on us in the first place.

Lastly, you ask the question “who gets a claim on who is to be what?” In other words, you are asking, who is to decide who is an Afrikan? This is a very dangerous definition to outsource to an amorphous foreign authority which in your mind is still undefined. If Afrikan people don’t take it upon ourselves to define who is Afrikan, it will be defined by other groups with different and possibly opposing interests to our own. The question can only be answered historically and biologically. We have to look at history to discover how the existence of people whom you call “black americans” came into being. Where did they come from? Did they give up their nationality upon being kidnapped and sold into enslavement. No matter who did the kidnapping, selling, and buying, the fact remains that this was a criminal act and these people were wrongfully stripped of their national identity. For someone who claims to want all people to “end racism”, it is very curious that you do not support the right of return of these victims of enslavement. Yet, you support the imposed identity given to them by a foreign people who exploited these Afrikans for centuries without compensation. Again, our collective political orientation is misguided. This is again indicated by the statement you made of there being something called a “‘half african’ born in africa by african parents”. This is a logical impossibility. The word half means 50%. Therefore, by its very nature, it cannot be a whole. Meaning a mixed person (a person with each parent from two different races) is logically neither one nor the other race. Barack Obama is just as much White and he is Black, so it is racist (anti-Black) to refer to him as a Black president when he isn’t Black, he is mixed. The people in northern Afrika are Arabs and they migrated in and displaced the Afrikans living there. They are not Afrikan. Europeans similarly migrated to Afrika, so they are not Afrikan either. It is the bio-genetic heritage that Afrikan people share through the traits that we have, (e.g. brown to black skin and Afrikan textured hair) that makes us Afrikan. This is a biological designation that relates to the land of our origin. It does not refer to a place someone who does not have these traits was born or whose ancestors migrated to. Race is discussed in the USA because it is a tool for political control. If it wasn’t, why were people rejoicing over the “First ‘Black’ President”? Why did whites overwhelmingly elect Donald Trump? It is because race matters and is important in political and economic affairs! No matter how much you want to discount it or decide “not to understand”, race will always be used for social and political organization, so it is best to accept this reality before you wake up and realize that Afrikan people globally have no control over anything and we are totally dominated by trans-national corporations and inter-governmental institutions that are controlled by Europeans and a few Asians, and have Afrikan people reduced to slave status yet again. I hope this answers your questions. Thanks for reading.


ACBN: A Primer, Now Available!!

13 09 2017

ACBN: A Primer

The new book by Kwesi Anan Ababio is now available in paperback and eBook!

Go to for details on how to purchase your copy!

The book is also available on iBooks and at You can visit the Kwesi Ababio’s Author’s Spotlight page at for more details. Click the links below to learn more.


ACBN: A Primer, to be released in September 2017

5 08 2017

ACBN: A Primer, is the first book written and published by Kwesi Anan Ababio.

The book discusses essential concepts about Afrikan Centered Biological Nationalism and gives full credit to those who inspired and contributed to the ideas behind the creation of this book.

The book asks and attempts to answer questions like:
Who is an Afrikan?
What is ACBN?
Why Mulattoes and Other Hybrids Are Not Afrikan?…and much more

The 142 page book is an easy, engaging read and includes a contribution by special guest author Gaspar Yanga who writes a brilliant epilogue.

The book has nearly 30 color and black & white photographs, endnotes, a bibliography, and references detailing and supporting the thesis of the book.

Get your eBook or paperback copy as soon as it is available! It is essential reading for Afrikan people in the 21st century.

Links and instructions on how to make a purchase will be posted soon.

Email to reserve your copy before September 4, 2017 to receive an email notification upon release and a 10% discount.

Include in the subject line “ACBN BOOK“.

The Bastard Factor

24 04 2017

I overheard a conversation recently between a mulatto acquaintance of mine and another Black man which revealed something very interesting about the unintended results of interracial breeding and the impact it has on mulattoes.

The mulatto was asked if he was going home to visit his family for an upcoming vacation and disclosed that he was not. The reason he gave is that when he visits his home it is not the same anymore because most of his childhood friends are married now and staying in his parents’ home is not an option due to their lack of interest in him.

He was pressed on his meaning of this final point and he subsequently revealed that his parents were perfectly willing to meet him in a restaurant for a meal and hear about details of his life, but as far as staying with his parents for the duration of his vacation time home, he was certain that could not occur.

Again, he was questioned as to why this was and he disclosed that his biological parents are actually divorced now. This was a bit of information that I did not know, but had suspected since I know that these tragic arrangements (mixed race marriages) don’t usually work out. His mother is African and was born on the continent and his father is an IMA (inbred mutant albino) AKA white.

He said that some years ago his father had remarried a white hippie woman and that she was a university instructor and very “liberal”. She was into all this LGBTQ-LMNOP stuff and during an alleged nonchalant conversation about “homosexual rights”, she had baited him into a trap of admitting that he did not really care about the political result of such matters one way or the other. At the time, the mulatto was 20 years old and was just not interested in whether homosexuals had or did not have rights. This is quite a normal view of people his age. But this “liberal” immediately ran to the mulatto’s father in tears claiming that he had horrible discriminatory beliefs and she was afraid of him and so on. The mulatto’s father backed up his new white wife and literally told his son that “She is my wife now and you have to accept it and her beliefs”. The mulatto later rightly suspected that this hippie wanted to marginalize the white man’s children from the previous marriage and succeeded in setting him up in a fake row so that she could justify the father’s decision to limit contact with him, which he ultimately did.

In an ironic, but not too surprising twist, the African mother of this mulatto is living in an all-Black neighborhood in the USA which is wrought with all of the stereotypical ills we have come to associate with inner-city living—single mother culture, limited worldview, lowered expectations, lack of social courtesies, and reduced income potentials. This it turns out is the reason this mulatto is living far from home and continues to seek out opportunities that restrict his ability to return there.

After hearing the story, I found it astonishing yet typical, and not all too surprising, that this is the result of these interactions. The faux liberal white male (or female) is commonly looking to fulfill a fantasy or desire for the world to reflect their half-baked ideology, and so he mates with an Afrikan woman in order to satisfy some sick personal need or to solve a perceived social problem which only he can do because of his “white male capability and compassion”. However, the social problem which is attempted to be solved through this behavior is never resolved and is only exacerbated. The outcome is that the white participant gets tired of their negro pet and the race-based incompatibility of the relationship rises to the forefront. I suspect that as time goes on, often the white partner (especially the male), realizes that the social capital they lose by marrying an ordinary negro and having mulatto children is not sufficiently balanced by their satisfaction in strictly adhering to their ideological tenants. So, in this case the IMA male divorced the negro and found an IMA (white) wife in order to regain some of his lost manhood and respect in the eyes of his white compatriots. This is why he mentioned to the mulatto son “this is my new wife now” in an effort to establish his new social reality in the mind of his mulatto son and limit his access to him in certain social situations. Moreover, because his son does not look like him, he had to, in a very passive-aggressive way, impress upon his mind that any experiences he will have because he is not a white person should not be brought to the doorstep of him and his new white wife. This resulted in the mulatto creating a life for himself elsewhere and pursuing not only non-Black females, but non-white female romantic partners as well. The likely product of his life, should he choose to procreate, will be another mixed-race person. The child will be either mixed with Asian, Arab, or some other female from a mixed-race group like mestizos.

The African mother who fought so hard to disavow her Afrikanity and possibly dreamed of a lavish lifestyle in the arms of her “rich” white man from the west, ended up terminating herself genetically and living among the very Africans that she was trying so hard to escape.

These liberal whites mate with Afrikans and other non-whites usually due to a sense of powerlessness in their own socio-political structure and want to feel some power, any power, by offering the fantasy of social uplift into unattainable whiteness to some random non-white sycophant. Reality creeps in eventually, and the white person, reticent to give up their “liberal” delusions, then makes the unconscious decision to reject the pet and her children and marry a white hippie who would protect his cover of being “non-racist” and interested in social justice, while he can safely and without negative repercussions, reject his bastard offspring from his ill-fated, sexual, social experiment. Luckily for them, the white legal system has defined his children as “Black”, so he is comfortably assured that he has no further responsibility for the outcome of their lives.

My conclusion and moral from this story…DON’T RACE MIX! It doesn’t solve the problems you intend it to solve and it invariably just causes more! There is no ultimate benefit to anything in this behavior except your loins (and by extension your ego) in such unions. The misplaced value that Afrikans place on pale-skin is a death warrant to your race and your own personal genetics. The mulatto children will quietly resent the position you put them in of being stuck between two worlds. That is, being rejected by a racist anti-Black parent and embarrassed about their self-loathing negro parent who hated themselves so much that they were compelled to produce a genetic mutant.


Celebrities Stupefied By Whiteness

9 04 2017

Great video by YouTuber Sista Indi. She has a series of great commentaries on the psychoses of (some) African people regarding their fascination of having sex with cavebeasts.

The Global Hybrid Assault

31 05 2015


Can you name one Japanese beauty queen in history? Or for that matter, can you name or recall a beauty queen from any country getting press coverage in the US media unless it involved some sensational scandal? Then why now? This linked article presents a “public interest” exposé about a Japanese hybrid for the purpose of furthering psychological terrorism on Afrikan people. The enemies of Afrikans have stepped up their psycho-biogenetic assault recently by installing hybrids as the new standard image for geno-culturally distinct groups. It is a necessary tactic to promote confusion and convolute the identity of victims of white hegemony in order for inbred mutant albinos (IMAs/whites) to claim that people who are unnatural beings (that is, hybrids, IMAs, kwk) on the planet are a representation of the advanced ideals which humanity is now manifesting as opposed to actually being an indication of its rampant degeneracy and depravity. Most of these hybrids are only here because of the failure of Afrikans to reject whiteness as a standard of beauty or to quell the aspiration to attain “whiteness” itself, in the manner of the Fanonian desire to “grasp white civilization and make it mine.”¹


So as to mitigate their own inferiority issues, Afrikans have taken to engaging in rampant hybridization with the unwanted rejects of other geno-cultural groups. This behavior contributes to propagating this madness of wanton hybridization as a self-inflicted wound in a war of eradication against Afrikans. It goes without saying that the primary aggressors in this relationship are the whites themselves and their love of disorder, (the only environment wherein they can thrive) which compels them to seek weak Afrikans among us and confer onto them trinkets such as, academy awards, nobel peace prizes, fake hair, and non-Afrikan sex mates. The linked article tries to assert that hybrids “challenge the identity” of a pre-existing geno-culture or race. This is absurd and is a conceptual tool being used by whites to foster confusion. It belies statistical reasoning to assume that because hybrids are created through sexual licentiousness then the essential constitution of the naturally occurring geno-cultural group is now different and therefore must reexamine its ontology and “spiro-genetic”² nature. The whites are using the media to magnify the occurrence of these entities so as to advertise an alleged “new age” on the planet. The unseen implication of this psychic violence to all who are susceptible is that if other “non-white” IMAs will assist the western Eurasian IMAs (whites) in the degeneracy of interracial procreation, then they (all whites) together can rid the globe of Afrikan people and create a new group of sexual toilets for whites to enjoy throughout eternity; people with no connection to spirit nor the psychological historicity of Afrikans from time immemorial. Groups of homogenous geno-cultures are being propositioned to embrace this perversion so to further break-up ethno-national traditions and values so that the IMA global imperial project of terror can breathe life for a few more decades, if not centuries.


Essentially, the character of the IMA imperial project is to release energy which is contained in natural formations so that IMAs and their non-white worshipers can consume what was previously a restricted power source and was used primarily to ensure the survival of a particular living entity. Most notably, this was done to Black-body humanity itself or Afrikan people. They have replicated this business model in other forms of “exploration”, chiefly in mining and oil extraction. IMAs typically will find some naturally occurring geological or physical formation and destroy it so as to release the energy contained within. (Think of the atomic bomb/Manhattan project as well!) They consume the energy like vampires and leave the waste product strewn throughout the environment without regard to the implications for divine order. The same continues to occur with regard to their “relationship” to Afrikans. They break-up our natural inclination to group-bond and participate in human activity with each other so they can gather the useful entities among us for themselves by awarding them with white wives/husbands, university degrees, high ranking positions in their institutions of brigandage and destruction, for example the U.S. department of justice attorney general Loretta Lynch or former U.S. secretary of state Condi Rice, among a litany of others. As a result, this process leaves the rest of Afrikans bereft. The many Afrikans who would have benefited from the talent of these individuals, (and incidentally who within a healthy Black-body humanity would have had to have a reciprocal relationship with the rest of Afrikans in performing their divine function by utilizing their individual talents within our society) are left stupefied by fake religions and chasing after cults of personality.


Gullible alienated-Afrikans (negros) who are victims of imbibing a false and foreign ideology fall prey to this psychological and bio-genetic attack, and through selfish personal aggrandizement, participate in sexual genocide against Afrikan humanity as a whole. The products of their lust are then displayed in various capacities so as to convince more confused victims that this behavior is “the way forward” and that any allegiance to one’s own geno-culture (race) is backwards and “racist”. Hybrids are given titles such as state’s attorney, national security advisor, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, news anchor, action movie star, beauty queen, and president of the U.S. so as to convince Afrikans that our future lies in destroying our genetics through immoral sexual practices and procreation with non-Afrikans. They are then offered up as bed-wenches and “new negroes” to the ongoing perpetrators of the rape of the planet (IMAs) and all done superficially hidden under a faux multicultural veneer. We must reject the whites and their offspring as being one of us if we are to survive as a healthy, distinct, and self-interested geno-cultural group.



1. Fanon, Franz (1952) Black Skins, White Masks. France. Editions de Seuil.

2. “Spiro-genetic” is a term used by author Odwirafo-Kwesi Ra Nehem Ptah Akhan which refers to the cosmological nature of Afrikans’ spiritual origins and essence. It indicates that primary in the universe is spirit and this is the matter from which Afrikans emerged and to which we still have a direct connection. This connection is transferred through genetics among Afrikan blood circles only and excludes non-Afrikans and their offspring.

Message to the adherents of the so-called “one drop rule”

4 01 2015

Part 1

Consider the following:


“The principal policy spheres where we make recommendations are in refugee dispersal, housing immigrations and national identity.”


This is the opening statement to Chapter 7: Conclusions and Recommendations of the report entitled “Changing Places: ‘Mapping the white British response to ethnic change’” Keep that title in mind as you read this blog entry. The report “Changing Places” was published and released in December 2014


This is a report prepared by DEMOS, a think-tank based in the UK. I checked its website and every single one of its board of trustees, and members of the advisory group was white…except two. One was an American-Afrikan and the other was a hybrid. The Afrikan also serves on a US based think-tank that researches migration policy and diversity analytics. He is essentially giving information to Western Europeans (Eurasians a.k.a. Inbred Mutant Albinos or “IMAs”) about Afrikans in the USA. The hybrid works at Pricewaterhouse Coopers, LLP and the Croyden Council and leads its Africa Business Group where he is apparently “developing opportunities in emerging markets.” So he is another hybrid front man for white hegemony.


Among the research associates there were a couple of South Eurasians possibly from India, although I am not sure. These two were not the researchers in this study, but for the confused culturally-alienated Afrikans who think its all about the bankers and the 1%, how do you explain the fact that think-tank after think-tank are staffed with armies of whites (IMAs) developing policy to destroy Afrikans? Apparently, some of these white people aren’t opposed to creating mulattoes either…just not too many of them.


Here are some of the recommendations:

(Statements written in italics are mine. I used BOLD in some of their statements to draw your attention to them.)


Refugee and social tenant dispersal

“We do not recommend that the Home Office disperse large numbers of refugees or …tenants from diverse areas to homogeneously white areas with low population turnover. Generally speaking, (white) attitudes to immigration harden as the ethnic composition of the (white) population shifts, and soften with habituation and assimilation. Avoiding rapid shifts in people’s cultural environment should be a policy goal. In this respect, dispersing refugees to heavily white areas with little prior experience of immigration is a recipe for discontent. It introduces disruption into the lives of refugees while engendering unease from white British residents unfamiliar with ethnic diversity.”


“…it remains the case that too many refugees are being dispersed to inappropriately homogeneous or close-knit areas.”


“…white British attitudes to immigration…expressed the highest levels of hostility.”


So here is evidence that IMAs have a policy formation process afoot which includes displacing Afrikans and creating white-only spaces for whites to live. Afrikan only spaces like the continent itself are not allowed to exist. We Afrikans must “integrate” with everyone else and develop some bogus multicultural consciousness to facilitate whites’ desire to use us to create economic growth while keeping places for whites only to practice their sense of being white (read: superior)


House building

“Earlier we noted that rapid ethnic change is associated with greater white hostility to immigration. Minorities are likely to be disproportionately represented among those taking up residence in newly built homes in Greater London… Our research leads us to warn against development that radically alters the ethnic makeup of existing (white) areas. We therefore recommend…schemes, which help insulate existing (white) communities from rapid ethnic change… “


“Sharp shifts in local ethnic composition caused by new housing development tend to increase white British threat levels. If these are viewed as being pushed by a planning inspectorate from on high, the policies may prove toxic. Indeed, they could further alienate the white British population from immigration and the political elite.”


So here we see a recognition of an agreed social relationship with the IMA political “elite” and the normal everyday IMAs of all stripes in contradistinction to the interests of non-IMAs, and especially Afrikans’ desire to maintain our own geno-cultural compositions. Let’s read further.


“Right to Build*(see glossary below) is a sound idea insofar as it focuses on the housing needs of existing (mainly white) residents. It also limits the potential for rapid ethnic shifts while accommodating a gentle rise in diversity. Even in heavily white British communities, minorities, being younger, are likely to have greater housing need and take up a disproportionate number of new places. The local authority* (see glossary) will tend to be somewhat more diverse than homogeneous communities; this, too, will offer an outlet for gradual ethnic dispersion. Self-build (i.e. Right to Build) thereby ensures (economic) growth while calibrating the pace of ethnic change to local conditions. Such considerations should not stand in the way of building the housing London needs, but authorities should try to mitigate the effects the best they can.”


Here is quite suggestive evidence of a methodical plan to regulate, yet intentionally create the prospects for interracial sexing and the creation of hybrids with IMAs who have sexual fetishes for non-IMAs. They intend to provide the non-whites “gradually” for availability to IMAs sexually under the guise of “socioeconomic development” so IMAs will still have the hegemonic advantage within this social milieu. This results in culturoeconomic (socioeconomic) destruction for Afrikans.


“Garden cities*(see glossary) should form a central pillar of new housing development as they ensure a mix of population from the start, without a memory of former ethnic homogeneity, while diverting rapid change away from long-term residents of existing communities.”


So here we see as Amos Wilson discusses in “Black on Black Violence” about the necessity of amnesia being present in the victims and targets of the system of white hegemonic domination for it to function properly and in the interests of IMAs. (pp. 57 & 83, Wilson, 1990)


This next part is very interesting…


“We live in a world of jet planes where one part of the world is ageing (sic) and wealthy (Stolen wealth and they are dying to hold onto it!) while the other is youthful and poor, (As a result of having been robbed by the aging and wealthy people), so immigration is likely to continue into the foreseeable future. What is urgently needed therefore is a positive view of English ethnicity in an age of migration: how today’s Englishmen and women should think about themselves and their descendants. One possible solution is liberal ethnicity – a form of ethnic identity which absorbs outsiders through intermarriage while retaining a relatively fixed set of myths and symbols.” (This was called having Black skins but wearing white masks by Franz Fanon, an Afrikan who married a IMA woman)

“People whom we currently define as ‘mixed race’ are projected to be the largest group in England by the end of this century. History is replete with mixed-background nationalist figures such as the half-Spanish Irish nationalist Eamon DeValera”, (sic)

A half Spanish-Irish is still an Eurasian-IMA from western Europe. The problem here is sometimes IMAs use the term “race” to mean nationality, i.e. German race, British race, Irish race, kwk, but they have vanquished our nationhood linguistically by calling us the Negro race)

“…mixed-race black American intellectual WEB Du Bois (mixed with what?) or part-Indonesian Geert Wilders in the Netherlands”. (Which part was Indonesian?)


I don’t know who the other people are but it is interesting that they refer to W.E.B. Dubois as “mixed-race black” and confused Afrikans almost without exception refer to him as Black or an African-American, Why can’t he be a mixed-race white? Marcus Garvey was the most notable exception to this when he rightly referred to Dubois as a mulatto.


“In other societies, the loss of particular traits, such as the Irish or Welsh language, ignited a more self-conscious project of identity. Therefore if history is a guide, England’s mixed-race group will probably identify with their English rather than non-English lineage as they grow in numbers and confidence.”


This logically means that the nature of social relations will facilitate this shift in identity. Hence this identity will be intentionally engineered, which also presupposes the engineering of ways in which interracial coupling will be used to help IMAs and hurt Afrikans and the Afrikan identity. This is why you will see more IMAs declaring publicly about how much they love their hybrid babes, or that they don’t have a problem with interracial dating and confused alienated Afrikans will think “Oh whites are okay, there are just a few bad ones, but those will die out so its okay to marry some of the good ones and have babies” Additionally when this age-old trap is pointed out by Afrikan-Centered Biological Nationalists we will be accused of being “racist” and not allowing individuals to make their own choices. We are warning you about this danger of Afrikan genetic annihilation because of our understanding that the logical foundation of any and all social relations with whites relies on a definition of whites as superior. Continuing…


“The idea that a more inclusive English ethnic group, along with their traditions and memories, can endure as the majority could offer many white British a greater sense of comfort, optimism and continuity. (Read: The mulattoes will carry on the “British traditions” for you) It offers an important identity choice to mixed-race individuals and to minorities who believe their children or grandchildren are likely to blend into the majority group. In the USA, the noted immigration historian John Higham remarked that immigration worries waxed and waned in step with the majority’s confidence in its ability to assimilate newcomers. So long as the ethnic majority accepts minorities as fully equal and legitimate members of the British nation, a more optimistic majority ethnicity should improve ethnic relations in the country. This is not a project the Government can or should embrace …it must remain neutral. Yet it is a communal vision that individuals, groups and media outlets in civil society could endorse. Many white British, mixed-race people and assimilation-minded minorities might embrace it. As long as this ethnic majority respects the rights of minorities it could prove an engine of integration, helping alleviate popular anxieties in an age of mass mobility.”



So here I think I have shown definitive proof of a master plan to create hybrids for the benefit of whites in a Western Eurasian nation significantly responsible for the destruction of Afrika nations. Remember, I mentioned that they had an alienated Afrikan on their staff who also served on a US think-tank. Are we so naïve to believe that this exact policy will not be implementing in the US and other IMA colonial states? Here they have clearly declared they want to develop assimilation-minded non-whites, to create hybrids who will be charged with carrying on THE BRITISH TRADITION, not the Afrikan tradition, and will subsequently further mix with IMAs, not Afrikans. So therefore, the one-drop rule is known, by their policy planners to not only to be incorrect, but is ALWAYS used to the benefit of whites and not Afrikans. If “the Black gene is dominant”, how come the production of hybrids has no benefit for maintaining Afrikan culture, standards of beauty, and generating power for us? Of course it goes without saying that many culturally alienated Afrikans are going to be jumping for joy at this prospect because their fondest desires for sexual self-annihilation will be realized. I guess this is what they meant by the title of the report, “Changing Places”.





Garden cities Policy focusing on building new self-sufficient communities rather than building housing developments around existing communities.


Local authority A geographical census division with a population typically ranging from 100,000 to 200,000 people.


Self-build (Right to Build) Policy in which local residents rather than developers are granted permission to build homes.


The full report can be seen here and downloaded for free


Matters of Purification for Afurakanu/Afuraitkaitnut (Africans~Black People)


Afrikan by ancestry, Afrikan in spirit, Afrikan forever

Afrikan Sovereignty Magazine

Examining the World From an Afrikan Nationalist Point of View

Gullah/Geechee Nation

WEBE Gullah/Geechee Anointed Peepol!

Black Homeschool Mom

A resource site for diverse home educators.

Umkhonto we Sizwe! (Spear of the Nation)

Independent Afrikan centered parenting and education

Word N Sound Live Literature Movement #WordNSound we trust...

Open Revolt!

Building the New Resistance

Black Women of Brazil

The site dedicated to Brazilian women of African descent

Too Much Black

We Done Begun

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury

The Only Way Is Ghana

Moving from UK to Ghana isn't easy Kraa

Ancient Kushites

Sanctuary for Black Gods

%d bloggers like this: