Socio-Political Fissures in the European Nation

9 12 2015

I define the european nation as, “old europe”, or continental europe, and new europe, or “the expatriate european colonial states” (usa, canada, new zealand, australia, south africa, israel, kwk). In each of these areas we are starting to see fissures in the socio-political narrative and the system of social relations. Different constituencies in these areas are in a skirmish to determine the direction of the global european imperial project (sometimes referred to as globalism, white supremacy, or white hegemony). Immigration is rife throughout all of these enclaves and the “liberal internationalist” factions (which include both the neo-cons and the social liberals — so this means the right/left paradigm is a total fiction) and the “white nationalists” (who are split between the social conservatives, libertarians, and the race realists, a.k.a identitarians) are the two main groups in opposition with each other. There may be more factions, but these are the general political streams of thought percolating among the inbred mutant albino (IMA) nations at present. I will explain some of the features of these groups as I understand them, but suffice it to say, these groups are indeed at loggerheads as to what the character and nature of “whiteness” will be going forward into the 21st century given the political-economic uncertainty and the psycho-sociological upheaval occurring in a world which is more informed, cynical, and hyper-competitive. All of this notwithstanding the rise of powers which will challenge (if not eventually replace) european hegemony as it has existed and been administered from the geopolitical “west”. (The “west” includes the usa and the western eurasian colonial empires such as britain and france).

Generally speaking, whites are torn between either more multiculturalism (which will exist under the conceptual superstructure of eurocentric thought), and ethnocentric enclaves (which are white only and purport to be “not hostile” to non-whites, but just seek to maintain european values allegedly devoid of the serial lies, rape, murder, theft, and pervasive brigandage which characterised the rise of europe and the maintenance of their empire). IMA conceptions of multiculturalism dictates that everyone must be fluent in at least one european language, have european friends and/or a european spouse, and participate predominately in european/eurocentric institutions and pastimes. Followers must also be amenable to any and every european perversion and socially and ideologically driven fad that IMAs can imagine, until such time that IMAs tire of it, and need some new stimuli to satisfy their emptiness.

Now I will attempt to describe the factions in more detail.

Neo-Cons

These are former “liberals” who were liberal with regard to economic policy which would allow them to “freely” enter markets (other sovereign nations) and jostle for profits against or in partnership with other organised mafia regimes commonly referred to as corporations. They are opposed to open competition, so they seek government protection in the way of regulatory frameworks and financial handouts to support their business enterprises, research and development. This faction includes the sub-ethnic group of IMAs commonly known as “jews” and their germanic tribal cousins.

Social Liberals

These are IMAs people refer to when they speak about an abstract political faction known as the “left”. These are largely a rag-tag group of guilty whites who seek to satisfy their carnal lusts via sexual encounters with members of other races whom they have vanquished. They seek to relish in being worshipped by non-whites as white saviours and commonly adopt negro pets (as well as other non-whites) to prove that they are “open-minded” and “non-racist”. They typically have sexual vices and substance abuse problems and a vague, amorphous definition of social justice. This degeneracy however does not limit their ability to achieve status in IMA society, so often they are professionals such as lawyers, professors, media personalities, and artists. Some have even achieved wealth in the IMA economy and use this to direct and control movements and organisations purported to be in the interests of Afrikans. They support large government spending programs to keep Afrikans from organising an economy for themselves and typically promote negro spokespeople and confused “pro-black” people to propagate leftist ideology. This serves to move Afrikans into a political dead-end and delegitimises the Afrikan nationalist movement.

Social Conservatives

These are people who largely self identify as Christians and claim that the usa was created based on “Judaeo-Christian” ethics (when in fact it is based on military science and legalese). They are against abortion and promote outward displays of Christian piety such as prayer in the schools and benedictions at public events. They pride themselves on their industriousness and self-sufficiency, but once one looks below the surface one will see that they are the beneficiaries of large “white only” government grants and stolen inter-generational wealth in the form of land, and other institutions and capital. They want a return to an era when white life was openly promoted and protected and everything in the society openly reflected their values and image. Some of these people are not in the strictest sense against multiculturalism, that is only if all of the representatives of other cultures adopt “Judaeo-Christian” ethics and reflect an adoration for western (read: european) civilisation, but they are rabidly intolerant of other distinctive cultures existing within their midst which they can’t subjugate or portray as inferior.

Libertarians

These people believe in the fiction of the individual and individually created success. They either reject or are not aware of the fact that an individual succeeds within the context of a social system. They don’t recognise that it is the set of social relations which provide the basis for the individual to realise their individual potential. However, with the utmost irony, they claim that in lieu of the government providing social services, individuals should seek out the essential services from their own community, such as getting nuclear power from your friendly next door nuclear scientist or getting open heart surgery from your cousin. Moreover, these whites who promote the individual as the sine qua non of existence, have seen fit to form a collective in the form of The Libertarian Party who have partnered with The Green Party of America to pursue a legal challenge to the two party duopoly of the USA. They claim that people should be allowed to discriminate positively and negatively, which means if they don’t want certain people in their environments or in their places of business then they should be allowed to restrict access from those people. However, they refuse to recognise the five centuries of brigandage and at least two to three centuries of media propaganda which has destroyed the reputation of other groups of people, and not to mention the fact that IMAs have stolen these other people’s wealth. So, if libertarianism were to start tomorrow, Afrikan people would be at the most severe disadvantage since we have no wealth with which to secure our livelihood and libertarians are staunchly opposed to redistribution of wealth by any federal means. So these people just want to lock in what they have stolen, or have been the beneficiary of, through organised robbery and theft so that no other group can jeopardise their standing in the european imperial project of global white hegemony. The most dangerous thing about libertarians is that they sound rational and are often very knowledgeable about certain features of the project’s financial system. However, their ideology is totally insane and would mean immediate death and extreme chaos for Afrikan people globally if it were administered from the centres of power in the IMA global hegemonic system.

Race Realists

Race realists see multiculturalism and anti-racism as being inherently anti-white which has the ultimate goal of white genocide. They reject the guilt trip that is promoted by the liberals and typically claim that  they are just as much victims as any other group. They claim that most whites weren’t involved in colonialism and enslavement and have not benefitted at all as a result of these crimes. They see whiteness and white only nations as something to hold sacred and many reject christianity as an imperial religion foisted upon them to replace their pagan religions which they practiced prior to domination by the roman empire. They glorify their teutonic lineage and “great aryan heritage” in central and south asia and believe that race is real and inherently matters in the organisation of a society, and that if whites don’t accept this reality, genocide surely awaits. A lot of their rhetoric is similar to Afrikan Nationalist rhetoric accept it is decidedly anti-Afrikan although some of them do recognise nationalist figures whom they wish had succeeded in separating Afrikans and creating a nation for Afrikans only such as, Marcus Garvey. These people see “globalism” as a threat to their survival and are resentful of the liberals and neo-cons for promoting mass immigration into the areas and nations that they inhabit, as well as using their tax dollars to fund foreign wars and wars of conquest instead of maintaining and strengthening “western civilisation”. They also call themselves the “new right” or “communitarians” because they feel the “old right” was co-opted and largely believed in the policies of the liberals and neo-cons. Some of these people are libertarians and some are social conservatives, but what binds them is the idea that whites are a separate culture distinct from other people and that reality should be valued and preserved without them being forced to race-mix with non-whites (especially Afrikans). Many also are vehemently opposed to culturally mixing with the european jew whom some think are the cause of the cultural degeneracy of the west and the undermining of their otherwise “benevolent culture”.

 

Conclusion

I described these factions because in my view Afrikans should stop chasing after inclusion in one political faction of IMAs just because they are at war with the another faction of IMAs in the hopes of winning favours by the victorious faction in the IMA civil war. We have done this repeatedly and each time we have been denied the attainment of any goal we used as a justification for partnering with one or another faction. In fact, ofttimes we only served as canon fodder in order to realise the fleeting promise of “freedom, brotherhood, & equality”. It is my view that Afrikan Centered Biological Nationalism (ACBN) is the appropriate political rationale that will serve the power interests of Afrikans. This ACBN rationale speaks to all of the factors that go into building and maintaining a civilisation because ACBN includes the social, psychological, biological, political, economic, technological, historical, linguistic, and spiritual aspects of an authentic civilisation which can be designed and fashioned in the interests of authentic Afrikan people, and most importantly, for the survival of Afrikan people. We, Afrikans, have wasted a lot of time being marxists, socialists, liberals, and the newest fad the “black conservative”. The one common thread in all of these ideologies is that the most successful adherents to them have all been preoccupied with chasing sexual favours and marriage with non-Afrikan people, and most often european males and females. This should indicate that the ideological design of these philosophies only serve IMAs and not Afrikans. Moreover, the common by-product of them is to create more confused and disruptive mixed-race people whom the whites reject. These offspring then enter Afrikan ranks to sow more confusion and disorder. It is time that Afrikans focus on Afrikans’ problems, and through that endeavour, strive to build power in order to secure our existence from these eurasians who aim at, and are capable of, destroying us.

Advertisements

Actions

Information

18 responses

10 12 2015
amosnwilsonuniversity

I was at the Book Store today reading on the Internationalist….Brilliant Article and much needed!!!!

Like

10 12 2015
Socio-Political Fissures in the European Nation | Amos Magazine

[…] Source: Socio-Political Fissures in the European Nation […]

Like

10 12 2015
Lumumba Afrika

Thanks for the support! I agree about the need to know the political factions of the IMA nation and their motivations. This lack of knowledge is why many Afrikans start looking for “good white people”, almost as a knee-jerk reaction to terrorist attacks IMAs commit upon Afrikans globally.

Liked by 1 person

10 12 2015
amosnwilsonuniversity

Good White People is a narrative created by the White Racist which turns African men into children. The notion of GOOD inside a group that maintains illegal control over you is insane and mentacide. The European is a formidable foe. Once enough of our people understand the European, they will become angry and want to seek the revenge and freedom.

Like

10 12 2015
amosnwilsonuniversity

The Good of the Iraqi People did not stop the White Nation of the USA of bombing the entire country. Once you follow the actions of Whites and their Nation States you can easily see the fallacy of their narratives but also come to realize its a form of WarFare and Coercive Power.

Like

12 12 2015
Kushite Prince

Their narratives are always false. They are the masters of deception. I don’t trust anything they say. I’ve avoided many pitfalls by always remembering that fact.

Liked by 1 person

12 12 2015
amosnwilsonuniversity

Good, you are learning

Like

10 12 2015
amosnwilsonuniversity

The IMAs love to baby talk grown Africans. By talking about innocent and good. Listen to the tone they speak about innocent Whites, good Whites. Or I havent…. Its condescending and deliberately deceitful. These Whites are masters are manipulating peoples minds and the callousness of their ways should have destined them for extinction a long time ago.

Like

12 12 2015
Kushite Prince

It always makes me laugh when I hear the term “good white people”.lol It’s very laughable.lol When have these people ever been good towards us?? I sure has hell can’t remember a time. What do you consider a good white person? As for me…I would say a white person that leaves Africans alone. One that doesn’t interfere with our affairs and does not date,have sex or marry a black/African person. I think that would be a great start.

Like

12 12 2015
Kushite Prince

“We, Afrikans, have wasted a lot of time being marxists, socialists, liberals, and the newest fad the “black conservative”. The one common thread in all of these ideologies is that the most successful adherents to them have all been preoccupied with chasing sexual favours and marriage with non-Afrikan people, and most often europeans males and females. This should indicate that the ideological design of these philosophies only serve IMAs and not Afrikans. Moreover, the common by-product of them is to create more confused and disruptive mixed-race people whom the whites reject. These offspring then enter Afrikan ranks to sow more confusion and disorder. It is time that Afrikans focus on Afrikans’ problems, and through that endeavour, strive to build power in order to secure our existence from these eurasians who aim at, and are capable of, destroying us.”
That was beautiful! You summed it up perfectly! This was a great post. Thank you for this one brother.

Like

1 01 2016
Bhekizitha

This article is an excellent analysis of the social and political landscape facing Africans. Your understanding that IMAs may have liberal ideas concerning their intraracial social relations yet remain staunch nationalist is expressed well.

For example, “these groups are indeed at loggerheads as to what the character and nature of “whiteness” will be going forward into the 21st century given the political-economic uncertainty and the psycho-sociological upheaval occurring in a world which is more informed, cynical, and hyper-competitive.”

Precisely, the first psychological quandary IMAs are facing is whether to socialize their collective to be nationalist outright or furtively and the second is how can IMAs maintain power while attempting to be the pseudo high minded consciousness of the world?

“IMA conceptions of multiculturalism dictates that everyone must be fluent in at least one european language, have european friends and/or a european spouse, and participate predominately in european/eurocentric institutions and pastimes. Followers must also be amenable to any and every european perversion and socially and ideologically driven fad that IMAs can imagine, until such time that IMAs tire of it, and need some new stimuli to satisfy their emptiness.”

This is so well stated nothing more need be added. Great work again.

Ngibonga kakhulu!

Like

1 01 2016
2 01 2016
D.

I’ve stop reading your post “at main two groups in opposition”… sorry I’m too tired to read the rest right now but before my eyes lock me into sleep mode I had to chime in a bit.
Would you say that in, let’s say, soccer, the attackers are “opposed” to their defense? No. They may have different purpose/role and therefore different positions/views, but that’s not opposition because in the end they are on the same team/side and have the same goal make their time win. So, all these groups are just here to make WS stronger. It’s not fissures really (the only fissure I’ve ever seen in WS is poor rich when it’s so unbearable they go crazy and start chopping their kings head off. That’s why they always try to pacify white peeps. Why England/UK/Canada is cknsidered a kingdom but not US or France…) What you’re talking about is more of a brainstorming session or coalition for whites. They rely on each other.

I’m too tired to elaborate.
Please don’t change your setting the Bhekizitha did. I hate all that subscribe log identify do this do that mindset to just do what you wanted to do, ie: COMMENT.

Good night.

Like

3 01 2016
Lumumba Afrika

If your disagreement is solely about the semantics of the word “opposition”, I’m sorry but I don’t follow your reasoning. According to the american Heritage Dictionary c. 2001 the present definition of the word “opposition” is listed as the noun form of the verb “oppose”. –> oppose – 1. To be in contention or conflict with. 2. To be resistant to. 3. To place opposite, esp in contrast or counterbalance.

Given the above definition, I don’t think my use of the word opposition is incorrect. I stressed in the blog post that these are factions in the European nation, and political factions vie for power against each other. For example, the republican and democrat political parties of the usa are in opposition because they represent different constituencies in the IMA leadership group, however, they are both committed to the european imperial project, they just differ in a minuscule way on what priorities should take precedent and how policy should be implemented, but yes they are ultimately on the same team. To use the sports metaphor further, when sports teams are being chosen, the athletes must compete with each other for a spot on the team. At this point they are in opposition, but once they make the team they fight on the same side. It is the same with IMAs. I have made a nuanced argument in my blog post concerning these different factions to reduce the confusion some Afrikans have during IMA civil wars, it wasn’t intended to suggest that ALL IMAs are not fighting for global hegemony, quite the opposite.

Like

8 01 2016
AfricaNeedsToOwnItsResources

Lumumba Afrika is totally correct.

What was the Cold War, opposing factions in the IMA global structure, you have to realize even during the Cold War the USSR received more funding that Sub-Sahara Africa from the USA and a significant amount of manufacturing jobs that left America went to Russia in post-Soviet times. These are the same people, pan-Europeanists who had different aims for their people but neither included seceding power to other races of people, even within the Communist world there was numerous confrontations between China and the USSR over China’s rise to power within it and the weakening of white hegemony over it’s economic system. The fundamental relationship between Europeans and Africans wouldn’t change (unless we do something about), regardless of which faction won the Cold War.

Rich and poor is far less important, ethnicity is, was and always will be the major divider amongst people, the reason Europeans develop the white race Europe concept (because there is genetically white people outside of Europe) was for all these groups to stop warring each other to conquer the world, remember the Berlin Conference, their major issue was tribalism, Europeans fought massive civil wars, mistakenly called by Eurocentrics World Wars, in the 1900’s they have always been divided, what happened when Communism fell in Eastern Europe it was nationalities, ethnicities and races that divided into their own states. If class was really the major dividing factor to Europeans then why is it that they chose Capitalism over Communism? Class exists in all groups, it causes friction but never as big as ethnicity.

Like

8 01 2016
Lumumba Afrika

“If class was really the major dividing factor to Europeans then why is it that they chose Capitalism over Communism?”
Great question! This is what negro leftists and negro socialists/communists refuse to consider. They are so warped in their adoration for foreign ideologies that they can’t see this fundamental reality. IMA nations are never going to adopt a political system wherein they must share power with Afrikans, period!

Like

7 01 2016
D.

Sorry for commenting before reading your entire post. Though it didn’t change my previous perspective as far as naming it “opposition”, I would have acknowlegded your conclusions as being most reasonable.
By the way, I meant “team”, not time in my previous comment, of course.
Just to close on the “opposition” argument: We have to be careful what we say. There is no opposition between teammates ONCE both teams are on the battle field or soccer field… As far as we go they are and will always be ONE entity with many faces. That’s why you have ideologies shared by groups that are supposed to be opposed as you stated yourself.
The general dictionary definition argument is flawed as well. And it’s dangerous to assume you see opposition where, AS FAR AS AFRICANS GO, there’s only complementarity. They are covering all basis. Hence why you see some whites claiming they are “victims of an anti-white agenda”. They saw they needed an added position to help their defense and attack strategy. And they always look at what we do and say to reuse it in their advantage… They were not blessed with much creativity, so just like chinese used to take pictures of their every creations to copy it, whites keep monitoring us (including what we’re exchanging right now) to find a way to reuse it in their advantage.
If you say something, they’ll disagree with you as far as YOU are concerned but agree with as far as they are concerned, because when used to their benefice, your ideas were brilliant, used to your advantage it becomes a danger to their survival, aka terrorism. That’s why we keep complening that they can do everything they want. Well, if the referee is

Like

9 02 2016
TheThinkingAfrican86

Reblogged this on Afrikan Sovereignty Magazine.

Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




AfriKaNeedsToOwnItsResources

Afrikan by ancestry, Afrikan in spirit, Afrikan forever

Afrikan Sovereignty Magazine

Examining the World From an Afrikan Nationalist Point of View

Gullah/Geechee Nation

WEBE Gullah/Geechee Anointed Peepol!

Black Homeschool Mom

A resource site for diverse home educators.

Umkhonto we Sizwe! (Spear of the Nation)

Independent Afrikan centered parenting and education

Word N Sound Live Literature Co.

...in #WordNSound we trust...

Open Revolt!

Building the New Resistance

Black Women of Brazil

The site dedicated to Brazilian women of African descent

Too Much Black

We Only Just Begun

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury

The Only Way Is Ghana

Moving from UK to Ghana isn't easy Kraa

Kushite Kingdom

Dark Matter Consciousness!

Saynsumthn's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

%d bloggers like this: