The Real Problem with “Racism/White Supremacy”

21 01 2018

In this excellent podcast by Onitaset, he examines the futile use of the term “Racism/White Supremacy” (RWS). He also gives illustrious analogies and metaphors as to why the common focus Black people have on “ending racism” is a dead-end road for Afrikan people, and Afrikans would be better off not only revitalizing our culture and nations to fit the threats we collectively face in the 21st century, but to actively seek power through the institutions and tools that are most useful at present.

I once read an exchange with a Neely Fuller-ite who was trying to seek sympathy for an east Eurasian woman who was allegedly being victimized by RWS. You can read the post here entitled, “The Counter-Racist Cul-De-Sac”. The commentator in opposition to this characterization mentioned that the Asian woman was indeed described correctly by the western Eurasian white woman as not being an “American” (read: white European). Furthermore, this east Eurasian woman had a west Eurasian boyfriend which is typical of these white-identified east Eurasian woman who are raised in the USA by parents who want them to be accepted by the dominate society as a member of the “model race” or an “honorary white”. The Fuller-ite couldn’t understand that the commentator was arguing that RWS only exists because it is a convenient excuse for Afrikans not organizing our own resources for achieving power, and that if the east Eurasian woman truly didn’t like RWS, she should re-patriate to an east Eurasian country which has plenty of nuclear weapons and a robust economy where she will be a first-class citizen. This obvious solution which was based in reality was rejected by the Fuller-ite because he needed to believe that “whites control everything and gave the nuclear weapons to the east Eurasians, therefore whites are still in control”, even if she decides to re-patriate. This is such a self-defeating position because it disables us, Afrikan people, from taking the initiative to secure our own survival. The west Eurasian woman went on to say that she was a supporter of Donald Trump and she voted for him so that “we can get you people out of our country”.

A white woman like that would be regarded as a right-wing extremist or a white nationalist. Regardless of her label, I implore you to read the following article from a typical “white-leftist” whom you Afrikan people think is your friend and the last bulwark against the racist right. You can read the full article at this link.

To summarize the article, the writer basically stated that she lived in Senegal for a year as a Peace Corps volunteer, and interspersed among the references to the “brotherhood of man”, “personal fulfillment”, and “adopted family” tripe that these fake liberals routinely espouse, she states a viewpoint similar to that of a right-wing fanatic. Namely, that Afrikan and west Eurasian (American) cultures are too different to be compatible, and that the solution is to let Afrikans solve their own problems and to keep America white by not allowing Afrikan migration to the USA! This mind you after she was fully funded and welcomed by Afrikans to live for a year in their country. But, be that as it may, this statement of hers is counter-intuitive the negros who need to be part of the “Kumbaya Klan”. (pun intended) However, increasingly, with the ease of global travel, these white lefties are returning to North America and Europe disillusioned with their grand schemes of building a raceless society, and are deciding to protect the legacy of what their forbearers stole through rape, enslavement, theft, murder, and war.

Onitaset makes the brilliant insight that what is called RWS by Neely Fuller-ites is actually warfare. Therefore, any approach to solving this problem should be decidedly warlike. Now the definition of warfare is broad and takes many varied methods, from economic warfare, to psychological warfare, and most apparently conventional warfare, which is actually the least effective and most expensive in terms of energy, and manpower. It usually is the last stage of warfare once all other forms have been exhausted or proven ineffective.

I implore Afrikan nationalists, Garveyites, Pro-Blacks, Afrikan Spiritualists, Nationists, and members of the Conscious Community to consider dropping both terms “Racism” and “White Supremacy” and adopting new terms. Kamau Kambon describes it as “white world domination by terror”, others call it ethno-nationalism, I prefer the term white hegemony which I defined in my blog post “Why Mulattoes and other Hybrids are not Afrikan“. It is also in my book, ACBN: A Primer. Onitaset has written a couple of books which I also implore you to purchase, read, and consider their ideas as well. It is abundantly clear that many of the ideas of the last century have failed or been impotent in the face of the dangers we face. With these books and new concepts, it is time to reconsider the approach we are taking to gain power for Afrikan survival and sovereignty.

Advertisements




Are Afrikan Countries “shitholes”, or Does the Truth Hurt?

12 01 2018

I am not defending Donald J. Trump’s alleged comments. However, in his brash way, (if he indeed did say these words, although he denies it) he has a manner at pointing out the obvious, and this is one of the reasons he resonated with the inbred mutant albino (white) electorate in the USA and became the president.

 

But the fact of the matter is that the term “shithole” is a euphemism for a place nobody would want to be for very long. More specifically, it is a place with ragged, unreliable, underdeveloped infrastructure, and severe socioeconomic problems that leads to desperation, poverty, and persistent disorganization. Does this describe any Afrikan nations you know? If not, then what is the reason for thousands of Afrikans to risk life and limb to journey to Europe on very dangerous vessels, piloted by very nefarious people to become second and third class inhabitants? No one risks their life to leave paradise.

 

To be more correct, it goes without saying that there are areas of Afrikan nations such as Ghana, Kenya, and Rwanda that have areas which are as developed as some other Eurasian nations and North America, but these are outliers. They are not the norm. Most of Afrika, (and I am speaking of areas populated by authentic Afrikan people) are still a long way from being dynamic and technologically developed nations. In many places the electricity is unreliable, roads and transportation systems are shoddy, and much of the technological infrastructure is owned and/or managed by foreigners. This includes engineering companies, water delivery systems, and health and medical facilities.

 

Case in point, if Afrikan countries were not “shitholes” as Trump allegedly chose to describe them, would Afrikan leaders like Mugabe and Buhari need to travel to Singapore or Europe for medical treatment? Apparently, they don’t trust their own hospitals and doctors to provide state of the art care. On a related note, I have personally seen doctors working in Afrika from Europe, America, or India who are barely competent and are only in Afrika because they can’t accomplish anything significant in their careers in their home country. The best and brightest Afrikan minds are enticed to go “study in the West” (or east) and then once they graduate at the top of their class at Harvard or Johns Hopkins University, we see a laudatory story about how they are an immigrant who “defied the odds” and “made it” in the USA or Europe. Typically they serve the white establishment and network of institutions while Afrikan nations continue their reliance on ne’er do well misfits, and misguided “do-gooders” with white skins from the west to “help Afrikans develop”. Wouldn’t it be better to just have world class institutions in Afrika in the first place so that Afrikan people can offer the superior care that we are already capable of doing? People often use the excuse that there are not enough skilled Afrikans to become doctors, engineers, pilots, and other technologically sophisticated professionals. Well, my question is, how long does it take to learn software engineering? Civil engineering? Medical science? Construction engineering? Piloting? Does is take more than 4-10 years of university studies? If not, after more than 60 years of independence, what is the excuse for not having these professionals trained, in place, and undertaking industrial projects?

 

Dr. Ben Carson is supposedly one of the best neurosurgeons in the world. He has written many books that are widely distributed around many Afrikan countries and they are read by many aspiring youth. However, he has not participated in developing the medical education system or the medical industry in any Afrikan country that I know of, why? Is he really qualified to be the HUD secretary in the USA when his background is in surgery?

 

Why is it that all of these sycophantic Afrikan-americans who slavishly follow the white liberals around are “offended” at Trump’s supposed remarks? It is because they would rather feel good about the liberal ideology of not pointing out uncomfortable truths which contradict their “one world, one people” fantasy. Do these Afrikan politicians, pundits, journalists, and media figures have any significant programs and policies which are designed to directly connect, and hence benefit Afrikan-americans and continental Afrikans in any demonstrable and measurable way? People decry the school to prison pipeline and the police shootings of Afrikan people in the USA, but where were all of these people when Dr. Umar Johnson and others like him wanted to start institutions to address these circumstances? They were either critical or silent. They are now only REACTING to media reports of what an anti-black man allegedly said (Trump). Dr. Khalid Abdul Muhammed once said that “when you toss a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one who got hit“. That seems to never be truer than in this case.

 

Now, I am not in support of Dr. Umar Johnson per se, I am only using him as an example. I know he was ambushed on a “Black news show” recently and many have publicly criticized and defamed him even though the charges levied against him by the state of Pennsylvania were frivolous at best and baseless at worst, yet many took the opportunity to castigate him openly. Now, I have definite disagreements with what he says at times, but I have never wasted my time to go through the trouble of writing an article or posting a video completely about him and his issues.

 

Furthermore, I am aware that Oprah Winfrey has a school in Azania for girls. However, have any uniquely talented students emerged from that effort? I don’t know, I am asking, and I hope that there have been. This great video by Mr. Superboy223 explains the hypocrisy of Oprah Winfrey regarding Afrikan development both in the USA and Afrika and how she, and other Black people like her, are only interested in being recognized by inbred mutant albinos and don’t really give two shits about recognition from Afrikans or what Afrikan people think about them generally or specifically. They return to the Black community when they need their “I’m Black” card renewed like Omarosa did, then they continue trying to snuggle up to white institutions and white people themselves.

 

In conclusion, I am not impressed with this phony outrage people are displaying at Trump’s reported comments. I just have one word for Donald Trump if he did in fact make this statement (which he has apparently denied doing). MORE ! Give us more Mr. Trump! This is why I wanted him elected, even though I did not vote for him. I wanted him to take the mask off of this fake liberal claptrap so that Afrikan people can see the face of our enemy once again, and then clearly understand what me must be about and what we must be doing. Even if he did not describe Afrikan countries as such (which includes Haiti even though the African Union doesn’t think so) if this possibly media manufactured incident doesn’t inspire Afrikan people on the continent and in the diaspora to seriously take up the Afrikan Power Project, what will? More military incursions into Afrika like France, the USA, and now China are doing? What will it take to put aside our silly, infantile feelings and build a network of strong institutions, connected by resilient infrastructure, operated by a realistic and appropriate ideology designed for the survival and empowerment of actual Afrikan people? This is the only source of outrage we should have now. Not at what our enemies are saying about us, but at why we haven’t moved forward more than we have. I say again here, as I have said in other posts, where is the international Afrikan media outlet that is solely and jealously focused on communicating a viewpoint from the Afrikan worldview and Afrikan interests instead of repeating what the BBC, CNN, France 24, and CGTN have to say? Where are the Afrikan public affairs programs that discuss the real issues we have instead of allowing western media outlets to dominate the market with simplistic tripe like the shows African Voices or Hardtalk where they simply reprimand Afrikan leaders and give fluff pieces about white people and other non-Afrikans going into Afrika to help “empower women”. This creates an image in the public mind which is not useful to the goals of Afrikan power. Until, Afrikans really get serious about rectifying our position in the world, people like Trump and these “good white people” will take turns at insulting Afrikans directly or indirectly, and giving unnecessary aid and assistance in projects that go nowhere and only lead to a continuance of Afrikans’ dependency on others. This, in my opinion, bespeaks of a truly “shitty” situation, if not an outright shithole as Trump describes.





Political Misorientations-The GWP Problem

30 12 2017

In these videos we see clear evidence of the system that Afrikan governments and their inbred mutant albinos partners are perpetuating. Under the guise of the “Good White Person” (GWP) coming to help enlighten Afrikans and help develop Afrikan economies, Afrikan people are duped by a very sophisticated propaganda campaign to convince us that any GWP who shows up on our doorstep is there to do us some good. The reality is that most of these people are business agents serving or in the direct employ of Eurasian corporations to bilk Afrikans of our resources and natural power. In the video below we see the case of one such person. A so-called jew from Belgium who has been “dissociated” from his consulting firm, Glencore recently due to the executive order Trump signed authorizing the seizure of assets from individuals or entities who have engaged in treasonous acts against the USA. His name is Dan Gertler. Yet, even though the political infighting continues among Eurasian political leaders, among Afrikans we are steady fighting among ourselves to see who can be the lone negro, privileged to sell our natural resources to Eurasian corporations to continue their political-economic domination over us. Isn’t it interesting that Afrikans see no problem with fighting wars and killing each other, but wouldn’t dare take up arms against these devils to secure our power and independence as a definable biological group of people on the planet.

The clintons, another duo of so-called GWPs have made a career of this practice. Through their Clinton Global Initiative and political connections they have made a second life for themselves by acting as a go-between for their political cronies and self-hating corrupt Afrikan leaders who see no vision higher than their own cocks and degenerate peccadilloes such as traveling to Europe, the USA, and the orient in order to engage in conspicuous consumption and receive fake awards from fawning and deceitful whites whose whole positon in the world is based on the cowardice of these Afrikan leaders. The video below is a case in point. Can you believe that while this shriveled old prune of a woman (Hillary Clinton) shakes hands with Afrikans on the continent, she is calling for the destruction and incarceration of Afrikans in the USA? She had the nerve to admonish Afrikans in the USA for not voting for her too! Both she and her symbolic mulatto son, Barack Obama cared more about their so-called legacy and political aspirations than in ensuring that Afrikans are empowered and have a correct stake in the global political economy.

Afrikan people need to see these clear examples of how our political orientation towards finding a GWP does not help our overall situation. In the search to benefit individually from a direct relationship from GWPs to fund a school, clinic, or become a business partner in an Afrikan country, we dig ourselves a deeper hole in our current political-economic malaise. The few trinkets that are cast towards us are nothing in comparison the the amount of wealth that Afrikan leaders and other participants in this relationship are willfully selling to these demons. These resources include minerals, lands, markets, and minds! Whenever one Afrikan persons joins the military or gets a scholarship to a Eurasian school Afrikan people jump for joy because “one of us made it”. But we don’t see that for every one that “makes it”, we all collectively lose, including the supposed successful Afrikan we are praising. Case in point Omarosa Manigault from the Trump administration. On paper it seems that she is successful, but with her ouster from the white house we see now that the success which she represents has no lasting sustainability. With all of the Afrikan musicians, entertainers, and other business people, where is the lasting Afrikan institution that has been built? There is a Carnegie Hall for Andrew Carnegie, steel industrialist, and Rockefeller Center for the oil and banking family, and even a degenerate socialite who is the heir to a global hotel chain. Is there any heir to an Afrikan fortune who has built an institution that benefits Afrikans? Please enlighten me on this question if any readers has knowledge of this. I do know that the heir touted as the richest Afrikan woman in the world is a mulatto offspring of the president of Angola and his low-class, eurasian jump-off from his college days in Europe (Azerbaijan). Come on Afrikan people! Can’t we do better than this?

Isabelle Dos Santos – mixed race bed wench





The Seedr Revolution!

26 12 2017

There’s a quiet revolution taking place. This is not a revolution of angry disaffected youth, or a political upheaval to impose a radical new ideology. It is a revolution of information and entertainment. Its name is Seedr! This revolt allows anyone, anywhere to access the best of movies, music, literature, and other digital media anonymously and without a great deal of technological savvy. Seedr has allowed me to watch all of my favorite movies from today and yesterday and catch up on movies I never had a chance to see. Seedr lets me listen to some of my favorite artists and access information I would have never known. All you need is an internet connection and a computing device and you can be part of the revolution in information and entertainment. Access hundreds of thousands of files in the privacy of your own home or office. Watch thousands of movies and TV shows on the go, or while waiting in those overcrowded bureaucratic offices to pay your parking tickets or access government services. Seedr is easy too. In years past people had to download torrents with elaborate applications that often contained viruses or took up a lot of hard drive space on your computer. Not so with Seedr. Simply paste a torrent link in your Seedr account, and stream the movie or music without ever having to download it to your computer. Save your disc space and your peace of mind! Seedr is a movie buff’s dream. I highly recommend all of my readers to become Seedrs! Sign up with a free Seedr account today  at https://www.seedr.cc/ and become a part of the Seedr revolution!





I Hate to Say I Told You So, But…

9 12 2017

Well, that didn’t take too long. Zimbabwe Economic Development Minister Patrick Chinamasa presented his 2018 National Budget amid much fanfare and adulation by foreign press outlets.

It seems that what I feared in the article “Uganda Begs for Indian Investment in Lucrative Mining and Tourism Sectors” is coming into view. I will highlight a few details from the article published by the Herald of Zimbabwe, then contrast that with an article from Bloomberg News (a journal dedicated to informing the Eurasian investment class about investment conditions and opportunities), and the above video from CGTN. The latter is the Chinese international news outlet which has a bureau in nearly every country on the Afrikan continent informing Chinese investors of economic and social conditions in the countries they have targeted for colonization. Please note that to date, there is not one major news media outlet that covers general news concerning the Afrikan continent except for CGTN, and a few individual shows on western media channels like CNN, BBC, and France 24. To my knowledge, an all Afrikan, international news network owned by Afrikans and designed to inform Afrikan people has not yet been realized. I kindly ask the readers to please correct me if I am incorrect on this point.

In the Herald article and the CGTN news video, the writer quotes extensively from Chinamasa who uses a lot of academic vernacular to communicate the intentions and policies of the budget. It is my view that he does so for two reasons. One to confound lay persons who might take an interest in what he is saying, and two, to directly communicate to foreign investors in the lingo that they understand—-because they created it! Chinamasa starts by claiming that the new government intends to focus on bringing back funds which were absconded by business officials to foreign bank accounts and money which was “externalized” through illicit monetary transactions. This is all being done to “benefit the general public” who pay higher fees and costs due to such activity. The list of foci in the budget are printed below. Notice the final highlight in the budget!

Highlights

  • Workers above 65 years of age to be retired.
  • Recruitment frozen.
  • Voluntary retirement scheme offered.
  • Cuts in staff benefits loom.
  • Redundant officers to be retired.
  • Rationalisation of youth officers. 
  • 528 unqualified Public Service members to go.
  • First class air travel for most Govt officers banned.
  • Vehicle scheme for senior Govt officials reviewed.
  • Indigenisation law revised.  ⇐**

In addition, there are plans afoot to re-introduce a Zimbabwean currency. Even though Mugabe had these plans as well, they were foiled due to economic sanctions which devalued the Zimbabwe dollar to the point of worthlessness. This quote from the newspaper “New Zimbabwe” via allafrica.com is very informative.

“One thing for certain which touched President’s (Mnangagwa) heart was the issue of re- introducing our own currency; that matter has generated a lot of interest amongst investors from South Africa, China even in the European Union who want to see this country progressing.

“President Mnangagwa is being accepted across the world with various countries pledging to work and assist the country to retain to its former glory.

BINGO! If there is any other clear indication that what happened in November was a coup to oust Mugabe and bring in leadership who would not only be friendly to non-Afrikan domination of the Zimbabwe economy, but privilege their command and control of the economy, it is in the above quotation.

With that said, Economic Minister Chinamasa further stated that he wants to speed up digitalization of financial services to make it “difficult for people to engage in dishonest and corrupt practices” Yeah, OK, I believe that because the 2008 financial meltdown in the USA, which was brought about by dishonest and corrupt practices, was really initiated by the fact that full digitalization of the US economy had not yet occurred. SMH. If anything, digitization makes it more efficient for foreigners to steal from the Zimbabwe economy because at present they have the software, technology, and infrastructure to facilitate and implement digitization. Moreover, the nominally “independent” SWIFT code system which is tacitly controlled through international institutions of the USA and EU is the mechanism by which sanctions are placed on countries which prevents them from trading in international currency, namely the US dollar which is needed to purchase goods on the international market most notably oil. The Chinese have been constructing their own “alternative” system for years now. It is called the CIPS “Chinese International Payment System” and they have been in negotiations with the Russians to implement it which was supposed to happen in 2015, but has not yet been widely adopted. However, with this new announcement by Zimbabwe, this could be just the opportunity the Chinese need to test their system on the Afrikan continent.

Another telling revelation in the article states that across all government agencies, the quality of services needs to be more facilitative and devoid of corrupt practices. This is because…

Zimbabwe competes with its regional neighbours for investment, business and tourism…

That is to say, Afrikans are in competition with other Afrikans for the attention of Eurasians, rather than in cooperation with each other to interconnect their economies and build strong industries which would primarily serve Afrikan businesses, consumers, and industrial projects. Let it not be said that European industries don’t compete also. For example, the European aeronautical company Airbus is in competition with the USA based Boeing company to sell aircraft and weapons systems to developing nations. However, the profits are recycled into the western economies to fund organizations like NATO and the UN to help white hegemony police the world and ensure that countries like Zimbabwe remain stagnant.

The new budget also proposes centralization of revenue instead of each ministry collecting revenue to fund its own budgets. This could be a good thing if the purpose is to create a strong and well-funded system to finance the project for Zimbabwean power, and hence Afrikan power. But it is not a welcome development if centralization is seen as a means to more comfortably interface with Eurasian institutions to more effectively control (and arrest) the development of a strong sub-continental Afrikan power state. Dr. Amos Wilson said in his lecture “The Falsification of Afrikan Consciousness” that:

“…it is not the mode of thinking (or organization) that is the problem, it is for what you use the thinking that presents the problem. If you use the thinking (or organization) for the destruction of Afrikan people, or use it such that it does not empower Afrikan people, then you are misusing it.”

According to the article in the Herald, A National Prosecuting Authority will also be established to “fight corruption”. This agency will be

“…required to publish reports once every quarter giving statistics on the: number of arrests made; number of successful prosecutions or convictions; and value of money or property recovered, as a result of their interventions”.

My question is, does this extend to non-Afrikans too? Will Chinese, European, Indian, Lebanese, and Arab businessmen and women be arrested when charged with corruption and convicted to long prison sentences and/or deported never to return if found guilty of these crimes and transgressions? It is one thing to punish relatively powerless Afrikan people for breaking the law, but it is a total other thing to let it be known that non-Afrikans will be herded into incarceration facilities and severely punished for their crimes too. In order to do this, crimes which harm the building of an Afrikan power state will have to be defined and codified, and then if people are found to be in violation, they must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Just putting small-scale civil servants in jail for demanding payoffs for carrying out their official duties is not enough. What about the crimes of expropriating resources, lack of skills transfer, and lack of appointing capable Afrikan men and woman to be the managing directors, chairpersons, and leaders of major industries, businesses, and other institutions in Zimbabwe? I have personally seen mediocre white people occupying leadership positions in many institutions located in Afrikan nations simply because they are white. These people have no superior skills and have not demonstrated any major improvements to the socio-economic life of Afrikans.  Most of them are there because they could not get a job in the west, so they are cast off to Afrika to serve as the “friendly white face” over which the locals drool in hopes of having the inbred mutant albino (IMA) facilitate their journey to the west or go into a ramshackle business with them as the sponsor and major partner. I have seen this first hand! Whites with cars, nice houses, and well-paying jobs, but are total losers and living the good life in Afrika, while Afrikan youth, with a similar education and skill set, can barely find a job.

This contradiction in focus on who is living a lifestyle beyond their means is elucidated in the last point from the 2018 budget mentioned in the Herald article. Specifically, the new policy of “life style audits of all public office holders to ensure that they are commensurate with their level of income”. How about the same type of audits for these foreign NGO employees in addition to skills audits to ensure they are not just lowly expatriates living a lavish life under the guise of “helping Afrikans develop”. If Afrikan officials must be scrutinized for their daily expenses, how about the same for these foreigners living on the teat of the western, neo-hippie, tree-hugging policy of “helping the third world”. The so-called “third world” has been developing for 60+ years now. Isn’t it time to declare that these “good white people” have failed?

 

Now, let’s look at the Bloomberg article, entitled “Zimbabwe to Cut Spending, Relax Its Black Ownership Laws”.

The top two bullet points in the article were:

  • Majority black-ownership law confined to platinum, diamonds
  • Country seeks to boost tax revenue to narrow budget deficit

The first statement just beneath those bullet points was:

Zimbabwe will trim spending and increase tax revenue next year and relax laws that require black citizens hold majority stakes in companies as it looks to restore confidence and boost economic growth, Finance Minister Patrick Chinamasa said.

My questions are, to restore whose confidence? Boost what kind of economic growth? Since this is a European Jew owned periodical, we know that the confidence to be restored will be Europeans and Eurasians in general. The economic growth will likely be for multinational corporations and investors with brokerage accounts in the major investment banks of the east and west such Goldman Sachs, Barclay’s, and HSBC.

The Bloomberg article further states that,

The unsatisfactory performance of the economy is being underpinned by declining domestic and foreign investor confidence levels, against the background of policy inconsistencies in an uncertain and uncompetitive business environment,” Chinamasa said.

Who are these domestic and foreign investors specifically? Has there been a survey conducted and published to measure the confidence levels of these groups? Since we know that Mnangagwa has promised to compensate the criminal European farmers from the land that they stole, are these the “domestic investors” of which his Economic Development Minister Chinamasa spoke?

Here in the next passage are blatant lies and misrepresentations printed shamelessly by Bloomberg News:

Former leader Robert Mugabe resigned two weeks ago after an army-led coup ended his 37-year rule in which agricultural output collapsed due to forced repossessions of commercially productive farmland. Zimbabwe abandoned its currency in 2009 due to hyperinflation and the economy has halved in size since 2000.”

So, readers are to believe that simply because land was correctly repossessed by Zimbabweans, the commercial productivity collapsed? That is to say that Afrikan people cannot learn how to farm in the way that the European thieves can. Or more correctly, Afrikan farmers under Mugabe’s rule didn’t simply produce cash crops for export into the European markets. Hence, they collapsed. Also, it was the fault of that notorious international villain who goes by the name of Hyperinflation that “halved the size” of the economy, not the crippling sanctions imposed by the USA and EU which isolated Zimbabwe from participating in markets and banking systems of the west.

It is now readily apparent that the present Zimbabwe administration longs for the days of European expatriate colonialism, and their only problem with Rhodesia was that Ian Smith wanted to operate the government by and for Europeans only and wanted to exclude the Afrikans. This historic error by Smith has now been corrected. So now, the Eurasians can return to devilishly exploiting the land and resources just as long as they give a few well-placed Afrikans a cut of the profits.

The last paragraph is very enlightening as it gives investment advice to readers who do their due diligence to research the companies mentioned.

Zimbabwe holds the world’s biggest platinum reserves after South Africa and also has chrome, gold, iron ore, coal and diamonds. While mining is the largest source of foreign currency, fresh capital dried up under the law forcing foreign, white-owned companies to cede 51 percent of their businesses to black Zimbabweans or the government. (Editorial note: Zimbabweans are Black so my strikethrough was to correct a redundancy) Anglo American Platinum Ltd., Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd., and Sinosteel Corp. are among companies operating there.

You no doubt have noticed that the companies recommended for investment are all Eurasian companies who sell/provide platinum to major defense, automotive, technological, manufacturing and aerospace industries. This will now be done without Afrikan ownership and Afrikan-centered directed policies for local investment to build local industrial capacity and independent manufacturing businesses.

So, we see in clear language the definitive and undeniable focus of the Afrikan political class. In my last post, “Green Shoots in the Black World?” I discussed the necessary caution people should have at hearing Afrikan political leaders engage in “bad Black talk”. It usually is a cover for gaining favor and closer proximity to foreigners. However, one thing is known from hearing leaders engage in such rhetoric, we now have definitive proof that they are aware of the structural and developmental problems that Afrikan nations have and of their solutions. It just so happens that most of them don’t want to pursue the solutions. The main reason for this is to protect their status as international second bananas, third tier technocrats, and fourth rate hucksters. I wish it were different, but for now, this is the situation we are in.





Green Shoots in the Black World?

8 12 2017

One can see the visible discomfort of the French President Emmanuel Macron at having to listen to the Ghanaian President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo outline the long overdue necessities for growth and development in Ghana and on the Afrikan continent in general. My concern is not for the anxiety of Macron, but for the veracity of the words President Nana Akufo spoke. You see, we have heard this “bad Black talk before. I am not discounting the truthfulness of the problems he identified in his speech and his obvious solutions to them which were elucidated by Marcus Garvey and many prior to him, but I am maintaining a healthy skepticism in my willingness to follow behind soaring rhetoric at the expense of hearing clearly stated policies and programs designed to achieve the goals which President Akufo-Addo conveyed in his speech. It was apparent that Nana Akufo spoke with passion and conviction, but so did Robert Mugabe in the video below. In 1997, Mugabe spoke of objectives which parallel Akufo-Addo’s statements, but woefully little was done in the way of actualizing these intentions.

Upon my viewing the Mugabe video, I saw the following comment posted and it sums up my opinions almost exactly:


“I heard this speech before and I agree with it. My only questions are, where were the policies? Where were the programs? Africans in American cooned over Slick Wille, swooned over Obama, hated GW Bush and now hate Trump, but have yet to develop one successful independent policy to secure our political future. We have seen more Black lawyers, pundits, celebrities and politicians carrying water for the DNC and Hollywood, but not one of these individuals or groups has developed anything of note to accept his offer. What was the Doctor of Political Science Condi Rice doing at this point? She was on her knees begging GW Bush for a position. Where were the usual suspects, Oprah, MJ, Bob Johnson, the CBC and others doing? They were running after white people. Unless African-American institutions and individuals stop preaching the mantra “we’re in a global world now” and start acting like it by developing independent political and economic policies which are interfaced with African continental policies and programs…we can forget it!

Furthermore, I have been a member of more than a few African-American organizations and they have woefully narrow goals. Home-schooling, cultural events, and small scale retail sales. We have not done what is necessary to build the corporate structures and governance practices to bring skilled professionals WHO ARE PAID into the fold to plan the strategies we need to take Mugabe up on his offer. We still think that “if you Black, you can join our organization” WRONG! We need people with skills and vision to occupy leadership roles for compensation who can get the job done. Too many organizations just let people in because they have dreads and ‘talk Black’. That won’t get us anywhere”


After stirring speeches are given in front of people like the representatives of white hegemony, Afrikan compatriots, and the world generally (since most everything now is transmitted through international media apparatuses), we then need definitive policy implementation starting with policy prescriptions that have been proposed by several Afrikan thinkers such as Dr. Chinweizu, Dr. Amos Wilson, Amilcar Cabral, Patrice Lumumba, Marcus Garvey and others. This blog serves as one such outlet to communicate Afrikan-centered policies designed to benefit actual Afrikan people on the continent and in the diaspora. I see my role as not dissimilar from IMA (inbred mutant albino) race-patriots like Zbignew Brzezinski or Heinz Kissinger who wrote books, articles, policy papers, and advised bureaucratic administrators and political leaders as to the most effective actions to take to extend the political power of white hegemony. Many of their recommendations have ended in failure and a loss of power for the European Imperial Project, and some were successful in the short term, but at the end of the day, they were valued by the leadership class for their contributions nonetheless. These inbred mutant albinos did not mince words about their goals in their official writings, and we need Afrikan policy officials to show the same allegiance and determination. The time is long past for simply using mere rhetoric to stir the masses, it is now time for unapologetic action and implementation in order to insure our survival and protection from continual enslavement by our historic and current enemies.

 

I consider the book I wrote “ACBN: Afrikan-Centered Biological Nationalism, A Primer” to be similar in relevance to books like “Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power”, “Between Two Ages”, and “The Grand Chessboard”, all written by Brzezinski which outlined the existential problems of power and solutions for the Anglo-American alliance. I consider articles written on this blog and others you can find in my Blogroll section to be commensurate with papers written by Kissinger such as “Peace, Legitimacy, and Equilibrium” (his dissertation) and his numerous op-ed pieces in the New York Times. I am not trying to inflate my ego, but a cursory glance at the literature coming from many so-called Afrikan “thinkers” leaves much to be desired. Even if there are writers creating similar studied works, the results from their adoption by the nation-states of Afrika have yet to be seen.

In addition to creating written works, Kissinger and Brzezinski served on various think tanks and advisory boards as directors and administrators. Are their similar such boards in Afrikan nations? I have traveled to several Afrikan countries and one doesn’t have to look too long or hard until one sees a United Nations outpost or a European Union satellite office. Moreover, there are copious NGOs, and foreign institutes interceding in the process of Afrika forming its own policies and solutions to its own problems. The presence of these organizations distorts the consciousness of Afrikans and they either decide to risk everything to go to Europe or North America to find the “good white person” and job of their dreams, or they develop a mentality that assumes that if they simply beg long and hard enough, someone will take pity on them and just handover the resources that they need and desire to live an enjoyable life. Neither of these solutions are prudent for long term survival and benefit.

So, to conclude, I do wish to work with administrations like Nana Akufo’s if they are sincere, but if this is just a rouse to get Eurasian nations to fork over more resources in an attempt to keep Afrikans on the global plantation, then they can forget it. But, if Afrikan leaders are serious, let us see them implement some of the policies Afrikan-centered scholars have been advocating for the last century. Furthermore, I want to see Afrikan-centered thought instituted in the educational systems so that Afrikans can train and educate Afrikan children up to the high standards that we set for ourselves, and stop seeking “equality” or sameness with our enemies. We need an appropriate education to solve our own problems and not an education in order to make enough money to buy the trinkets that are created and manufactured by foreigners.

Afrika for the Afrikans!

It’s been since time to be about that!





Political Misorientations: Afrikans’ Undying Love for Eurasian People

1 12 2017

Below is an article taken from the online news website Zero Hedge which outlines the neocolonial status of West Afrikan states still under French control. In my continuing series on the political misorientations of Afrikan people, here is proof positive that Afrikans’ undying love of everything white is the second most important factor in why there is not a sub-continental nation-state in Afrika with the geopolitical power of a country like Russia, China, or the USA. (The first problem being IMAs/Whites/Eurasians themselves) Not only are the political class totally beholden to their colonial masters, they are purposefully enriching this Euro-trash despite the fact that they are functionally bankrupt. I have written in other blog posts about how unless Afrikan nations take control of their own monetary policy by instituting their own currency outside of the USA/European controlled system, real economic development will remain a distant possibility. In the article below, what struck me as astonishing is that after France lost its other colonies like Algeria and Vietnam, Afrikans stayed loyal to their colonial oppressors even though other colonies had taken violent and revolutionary action to break free from their control. After the second European Imperialist War (1939-1945), the French colonies of Afrika did little to seize the initiative and separate from a mortally wounded French empire. Instead, the political class, educated in the Sorbonne and other French universities, doubled-down on more French wine, cheese, crepes, and white women. This is the problem which is becoming more apparent by the day as European hegemony falters to the pressures of debt and social disorganization brought on by immigration, decadence, and loss of inner purpose.

In the interview below, Dr. Obadele Kambon discusses the historical war between Eurasians and Afrikan people. He places this in the context of the recent events in Zimbabwe. Dr. Kambon also mentions the fact that the new President of Zimbabwe, Emmerson Mnangagwa, has promised to compensate the demonic European thieves who stole land from Afrikans for the land which Mugabe rightly re-appropriated. I have one question. If it is magnanimous to give money to whites who seized ill-gotten gains and then these properties were returned to the rightful owners, is President Mnangagwa going to call for reparations to be paid to Afrikans for the crimes of the UK, France, the USA and other white nations? Will he put as a condition of compensation to the white farmers, the concomitant payment of reparations to the descendants of Afrikans who were enslaved in the Western hemisphere? This hypocrisy reveals the true nature of the “revolutionary leadership” in Afrikan nations. In my book “ACBN: A Primer“, I mentioned that many of these so-called revolutionaries were only angry that they couldn’t get white wives/husbands and were treated as second-class citizens in the colonial empires even though they had attained a similar degree of education as their Eurasian counterparts. This misguided motivation to change the status-quo has persisted to this day and has foisted complacency on the Afrikan world while other Eurasian nations have been busily developing for the eventual takeover of European hegemony.

 

 

The article below clearly states that the manipulated exchange rates which favored the French colonialists and the Afrikan political class, has eventually impoverished the French working and middle class in the metropole of France, and to a greater degree, the Afrikan farmers and other Afrikan consumers who are not benefiting from the economic deals of Afrikan politicians. This with unregulated immigration has initiated a nativist political movement typified by the National Front in France with many counterparts in other parts of Europe. Similar to the Reconstruction Era in the USA after the US Civil War, whites feel betrayed by their elites whom they see as giving support to an immigrant class of upstarts and carpetbaggers. They purport that these migrants from the Afrikan colonies are being protected by a utopian political-economic ideology, believed by their elites, which disenfranchises the whites and seemingly gives unearned privilege to the non-native born people living in France. Now, I have no sympathy for the plight of Eurasian nations, they are thieves and criminals and deserve their comeuppance. However, so do the Afrikan political class who have sacrificed Afrikan development on the alter of living an imitation of life created in the imagination of the Europeans and other Eurasian peoples.


Paris – The Capital Of West & Central Africa

 Once France was one of “the great powers”, dominating Europe and parts of the world in terms of culture and economy. The country’s demise started after the Second World War, though it still played a key role in the creation of the European Union and the euro, which was to prevent Germany from subjugating the rest of the continent.

However, this strategy has failed and Berlin has become Europe’s capital, with France’s importance ever dwindling.

France’s population is slowly being substituted for by people from Africa. Renaud Camus calls it the “grand replacement”. Paris, once a European, then a global is slowly turning into an African metropolis. If French elites, whose influence in Europe is fading, want to remain a world power, they can only opt for Africa. Qaddafi, the king of the kings, became a threat to France’s interests on the continent. It were not the Americans that pushed for Qaddafi’s replacement but the French elites.

Although the days of colonialism officially came to an end in the 1960s, Paris has not given up its position of a great power on the Dark Continent.

France controls most of the countries in West and sub-Saharan Africa politically, economically and through a strong military presence.

Gendarme without backbone

France’s current zone of influence in Africa is the result of the policies of President Charles de Gaulle, who was unable to come to terms with his defeats in Indochina (1954) and Algeria (1962) and therefore sought to achieve the dominance of France in his former colonies. After de Gaulle, however, other presidents did not refrain from using military force and violence in Africa to defend their interests, on the pretext of protecting human rights and democracy. The French often achieved the opposite, because they made the same mistakes in their military actions as Americans made elsewhere in the world: they supported people who later became their enemies or violated human rights.  For example, it was the regime of Juvenal Habyariman in Rwanda that was supported by Paris: the French supplied Hutu combat groups with weapons, thus contributing to the Tutsi massacre. Hollande, who in Paris and Europe was perceived as a weakling, showed the face of a warrior and sent heavy units and fighter planes to Mali in 2013. This would not have been necessary if French President Sarkozy and the USA had not overthrown Qaddafi. It was Sarkozy that initiated the NATO led airstrikes against Libya. The removal of Colonel Qaddafi gave rise to the creation of the Caliphate with the help of Tuaregs in the north of Niger and Mali. After a few years since the start of the mission in Mali one wonders: has it made Europe safer? Has the flow of migrants been stopped through Sahel countries? Are the Jihadists of African descent a lesser threat in Europe?

The cost of the military action in Mali in 2013 amounted to 650 million euros. Operation Barkhane (as it is called) continues to this day and costs the French budget €500 million per year. Of course, democracy in Mali is a top priority for most Europeans, right?

A total of 9,000 French soldiers are currently stationed in Chad, Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Gabon, the Central African Republic and Djibouti. The growing military presence is intended to support the fight against terrorism and crime, in fact it is about the French elites extending their power to the south, reaching for cheap raw materials and outlet markets.

Common currency – Central African Republic sponsored by Mario Draghi

To preserve power, a sovereign needs not only to have an army but even more so issue a currency. Paris knows about this and uses a currency of its own to preserve its colonial power. It is beneficial for the government and large corporations that it represents: uranium from Niger and Gabon, cocoa from Ivory Coast, peanuts from Senegal, commercial orders for French companies in many different countries of West and Central Africa – some 1,000 French companies operating in francophone Africa generate annual profits of around €52 billion. Such profits would not be possible without the CFA franc. The CFA franc is the official currency in 14 African countries with a total population of 140 million.

Its history can be traced back to the Bretton Woods conference after the Second World War: as in all countries participating in the Bretton Woods system, there was considerable inflation in France. The introduction of a quasi-parallel currency should devalue the real franc and lower inflation in the African countries because the Africans cannot print money at will. Banque de France thus guaranteed the convertibility of the CFA franc into the real French franc for many decades and ensured its devaluation and a fixed exchange rate:

Since the introduction of the euro, the CFA franc has been linked to the common European zone. Still, it is the French treasury that is responsible for its stability and so it is the French tax payers who are held liable.

The monetary union thus transferred the cost of the CFA zone to the French taxpayer. Is it clear to an average French taxpayer that he is not only confronted with the cost of mass-migration and that, apart from the billions in development aid, which is usually wasted anyway, part of his tax goes to Africa? Part of it? Well, how much is that? Those responsible are happy to keep quiet about this. Try to get the information out, it’s like France’s state secret. The Maastricht Treaty provides proof of this: it says nothing about the CFA. Perhaps the French signed the treaty because the financial burden was too heavy for them?

Carrot for African elites, French conglomerates and… migrants

Let us take just one country as an example: Senegal, a popular destination for French presidents. Rolf Heimer wrote:”The devaluation (1994) of the CFA had two aspects: on the one hand, exports of its most important product, peanuts, actually rose in 1994/5, and thus the income of the plantation owners, who belonged to the elite; on the other hand, the majority of the population continued to impoverish, as the higher prices for the fertilizers and pesticides imported from abroad meant much lower income for most small farmers.

While devaluation against the franc or the euro makes imports from Europe more expensive, linking the CFA franc to the strong euro reduces the competitiveness of African CFA countries. It favours imports from countries with weaker currencies (e. g. China, Nigeria, India and Thailand). In addition, most of Africa’s exports are calculated in dollars, meaning that the loss is double, since any appreciation of the euro against the dollar worsens the total value of exports. It was particularly clear in the years 2000-2010: the appreciation of the euro put the CFA countries at a disadvantage. The African countries do not form an optimal currency area. It means that the group of countries can be hit by crises that are economically too much asymmetric: one of them can be worse off while others can be booming. There is no coordinated fiscal policy ensuring that capital is transferred from states that are doing well to those that are doing poorly. For example, rises in oil prices can cause immense damage to employment and production capacity in one country, as their central banks cannot cushion the negative effects of changes in nominal exchange rates, while another country may profit from the phenomenon. Even though the CFA guarantees its countries lower inflation and fiscal discipline imposed by the ECB, the question here is whether the cost of the single currency will not outweigh expected profits.

Who profits from it? It is certainly Africa’s upper classes and migrants. Thanks to CFA, the former can buy luxury goods at low prices in Europe and transfer French lifestyle to Africa, while the latter can rely on their homes in Ouagadougou or Dakar to retain their value.

Macron – a man who will change everything?

You must be joking. During his February visit to the former French colony of Algeria, he said:“Colonization is part of French history. It is a crime against humanity, a real barbarity. You have to face that part of the past and apologize for what has been done.” 

From a historical perspective it was a strange remark, because the French conquered Algeria while it was under the Ottoman rule to end Berber slave raids and piracy. Politically, his apologies make sense in that to rule the African continent, the Paris elites should win the hearts and minds of the black “French” peasants.








ODWIRASEM

Matters of Purification for Afurakanu/Afuraitkaitnut (Africans~Black People)

AfriKaNeedsToOwnItsResources

Afrikan by ancestry, Afrikan in spirit, Afrikan forever

Afrikan Sovereignty Magazine

Examining the World From an Afrikan Nationalist Point of View

Gullah/Geechee Nation

WEBE Gullah/Geechee Anointed Peepol!

Black Homeschool Mom

A resource site for diverse home educators.

Umkhonto we Sizwe! (Spear of the Nation)

Independent Afrikan centered parenting and education

Word N Sound Live Literature Movement

...in #WordNSound we trust...

Open Revolt!

Building the New Resistance

Black Women of Brazil

The site dedicated to Brazilian women of African descent

Too Much Black

We Done Begun

Real Currencies

Supporting People and the Commonwealth and resisting the Money Power by defeating Usury

The Only Way Is Ghana

Moving from UK to Ghana isn't easy Kraa

Ancient Kushites

Sanctuary for Black Gods

%d bloggers like this: